Peterborough has been voted the second worst place to live in a recent poll. But is that fair, or accurate even? Is our fair city really that bad? (image: Getty)Peterborough has been voted the second worst place to live in a recent poll. But is that fair, or accurate even? Is our fair city really that bad? (image: Getty)
Peterborough has been voted the second worst place to live in a recent poll. But is that fair, or accurate even? Is our fair city really that bad? (image: Getty)

Seven reasons why Peterborough is NOT the second worst place to live in England

One of the worst places to live in the country, really?

This week it was revealed Peterborough had come second in a survey to find the worst places to live in England.

The poll, which was compiled by iLivehere and asked more than 100,000 people, placed our city second only to Luton, the outright ‘winner.’

Portsmouth, home of the Royal Navy and once the pride of the south coast, took third sport.

Is our fair city really that bad, though?

Sure, Peterborough isn’t as easy on the eye as the likes of York or Bath, and we’re not blessed with the same wealth of cultural treasures as you’ll find in Oxford or Manchester. It’s also true that the nightlife of Liverpool and Bristol is on a completely different level, and that our infrastructure and transport is less comprehensive than other cities which have seen more significant investment in these areas.

And of course, Peterborough also has more than its fair share of issues in the realms of crime, unemployment, poverty and public funding.

But let’s be honest – what good-sized city doesn’t?

However, we can’t help but feel that landing second place in a survey which puts Bournemouth, Oxford and Henley-on-Thames in its Top 20 is more than a little harsh.

So, we thought it’s only fair to highlight some of the more positive things that we Peterborians can be proud of about our city in the next seven images: