East of England Showground promoter looks to the 'next steps' for homes and leisure village development plans
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
A land promoter says it intends to work on the ‘next steps’ to progress its plans for a homes and leisure village development on the East of England Showground despite criticism from councillors.
The comments from officials of the Asset Earning Power Group (AEPG) come just days after Peterborough City Council’s planning committee rejected an outline planning application to build 670 homes on part of the 164 acre Showground.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAnd while the committee approved a separate outline planning application for 850 homes plus a leisure village, school, hotel and care village on an adjoining part of the Showground, councillors imposed a six months deadline for AEPG to resolve traffic concerns and agree a Section 106 statement.


Councillors say that if the concerns are not addressed and there are no reasons to extend the six month time period, council officers have been authorised to issue a planning refusal.
AEPG has been chosen by the Showground owners, the East of England Agricultural Society, to find alternative uses for the venue that it says is no longer needed as the Society finds new ways to carry out its duties.
Asked for a response to the committee’s decision, a spokesperson for AEPG said: “We were delighted the Officer’s recommendation was approved for the major application.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad"We will continue to work closely with the Peterborough City Council planning team on the next steps progressing the development of the showground.”
However, the AEPG spokesperson declined to answer other questions from the Peterborough Telegraph about its future approach to the development.
Questions about a possible appeal to overturn the planning committee’s decision to refuse the 670 homes planning application or whether AEPG might go back to the drawing board and put together a new application were not answered.
AEPG also did not answer a question about when a detailed planning application for the 850 homes and leisure village development might be submitted to the council.
And it did not offer a response to a question about whether AEPG or even the East of England Agricultural Society might opt to walk away from the whole thing.
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.