Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Alan Swann: No wonder football is seen as a corrupt sport


World of Sport - 15/07/08

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 July 2008
Alan Swann

IT'S really no wonder that football is seen as a corrupt sport full of egos, simpletons and avaricious oafs when a fool like Sepp Blatter is in charge of the global game.
Blatter has laughably taken Cristiano Ronaldo's side in his ongoing battle to leave Manchester United for Real Madrid just one year after signing a new five-year deal.

Holding Ronaldo to his contract is a form of slavery according to the FIFA chairman which must come as a bit of a shock to those helping to churn out footy shirts for 2p an hour in Asian sweatbox factories.

I don't know many professional businessmen, never mind slaves, who can earn £120,000 per week and yet I hope both sides of this particular saga come out badly.

Ronaldo is behaving like the petulant prat we all suspected he was, but United are just getting a rather hefty dose of their own medicine.

Didn't they employ the same tactics Madrid are using to unsettle Louis Saha at Fulham? And what a great waste of their time chasing that feeble-bodied forward that was.




FURTHER evidence of the madness currently afflicting football comes in the form of two proposed transfers.

Frank Lampard, who may be a bore with a great chip on his shoulder, but has scored a few goals and won a few pots in his time, is the subject of a £7.9 million bid from Inter Milan which is just £1.5 million more than what Fulham are apparently prepared to pay West Ham for Bobby Zamora.

Now Zamora may well be a better player than that nine foot tall Norwegian donkey who plays at the back at Craven Cottage, but he's pretty useless nonetheless.

I know Fulham chairman Mohammed Al Fayed is seen as eccentric in some quarters, but surely not even he's mad enough to sanction that deal.




WELL done again to the Football League for trying to ensure that cheats only prosper in parliament and not in our national game.

Luton Town starting next season on -30pts is about right in my book. Ignore what Hatters fans tell you, they gained an advantage by signing players in underhand ways – players that helped them maintain a false position in the Football League ladder for years.

FOR someone so huge and with such massive on-field presence, new England rugby union manager Martin Johnson is keeping a ridiculously low profile.

Two embarrassing defeats in New Zealand and an accompanying sex scandal and yet hardly a peep has been heard from the big man.

At least the disciplinary committee set up to discuss the players off-field activities gave me the biggest laugh of last week. There hasn't been a bigger whitewash since the Hutton Report.

The full article contains 470 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 15 July 2008 10:13 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

,

15/07/2008 16:31:42
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

,

15/07/2008 18:13:03
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
3

Bucks,

15/07/2008 22:29:57
Your world of sport is brilliant Swanny!! Every week people go off on one and rise to the bait, makes me chuckle. As for your comments this week, spot on how Sepp Blatter has a job at the top of football i'll never know, that job suits him like that little Russian bird suited Ronnie Wood and Damn right Luton should be deducted 30 points Posh were demoted for finacial irregularities, that makes a 30 point deduction look lean to me!!
4

gary2,

16/07/2008 08:28:14
1. Sepp Blatter was exposed as an alleged crook in a BBC "Panorama" documentary not long ago, "elected" President under very suspicious circumstances.
2. Isn't he supposed to represent FIFA, or is he a law unto himself?
So, what right does he have to make inflammatory comments which are purely his personal opinion? He should shut his big mouth and think before he speaks (or maybe he doesn't know what he thinks until he hears what he says).
5

Raph,

Peterborough 16/07/2008 13:33:47
Agreed about Sepp Blatter . . . he is corrupt; just as bad as the man he has in charge of CONCACAF who is probably an even bigger crook.

I think that Platini is a breath of fresh air and is football man . . . he should be the next head of FIFA.
6

Tim Lovejoy Appreciation Society,

16/07/2008 14:12:36
Swann - if you can extract your head from whichever backside it's currently residing in, would you care to tell me the difference between what Luton have done (which impacts very little on other clubs) and a situation where a club was "sponsored" by its chairman's business in a deal that made no commercial sense whatsoever to quite blatantly circumvent the salary cap rules, and essentially buy their way to promotion?

Here's hoping teh rumours about your hero's finances are true. Still, I'm sure that Hawminney will make sure that Peterborough are treated more equally than any other club.
7

Luton Town Fan,

16/07/2008 14:36:23

Blimey, are you the biggest idiot in Journalism?
If not I can't wait to see who you think is.

Your comments are laughable, please tell me they don't let you out of Peterborough. It's the only place I know that would allow morons like you to roam freely.
8

Luton Fan # 2,

16/07/2008 14:59:23
Your article is the type of amateurish journalism which will never see you rise any higher up in the chain than at this petty local rag.

If you had chosen to do your research, you will find out that it was the previous crooked owners at Luton Town, who owned the company they were making payments from, were to blame. As soon as other people at the club became aware, it was brought to the FA's attention, otherwise they would still be none the wiser. In your infinite lack of wisdom, you also failed to miss that the people in charge of the club at the time and the unlicensed agents, got away with petty fines and a slap on the wrist while the club (minus the corrupt owners due to the fans forcing them out last season) got punished severely.

Also I agree with one of the other comments on the board, do you actually know anything about football? The reason Lampard is going for the amount he is, is due to his age and the time left on his contract. They either get a smaller amount for him or let him go for free. I can't believe I am having to explain this to a so called journalist.......

You are an absolute joke and an embarrasment to your newspaper.

9

Luton fan#3,

A false position apparently 16/07/2008 15:20:18
So Luton signed players in underhand ways?

Hmmmmmmmmm. How is that any more underhand than using a kit sponsorship to sidestep the 60% turnover salary cap allegedly?
10

Zealot,

Aberdare 16/07/2008 15:23:50
Congratulations on an excellent 'article' Mr Swann. I'm really not sure you how manage to do such a good job of putting this stuff together without giving any hint that you are deliberately being controversial in order to wind people up. Pure genius... or as you might say 'Top Banana'.

Keep this up and I'm sure your career is heading for bigger and better things. You'll be working for the Norwich Observer before you know it. Just keep dreaming.

I mean... fancy getting paid to fill a newspaper with poorly researched and factually incorrect nonsense. How do you do it? What's the secret?
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.