Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Video: 'Save the Great Northern Hotel'



View Video
Download Video

Video

Owner Peter Boizot speaks of his opposition to the threat of the demolition of the Great Northern Hotel.
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
10 January 2008
Since Tuesday's front page about the possible plans to demolish the Great Northern Hotel, we have been inundated with messages from angry readers backing a campaign to save the Peterborough landmark. Here are just a few:
Jane Wilson: "My husband and I celebrated our wedding in 1998 with our reception at the Great Northern Hotel, and in March 2008 we are returning there to mark both 20 years of marriage and our daughter's 18th birthday with around 100 friends and family.

"We would be deeply saddened to see the hotel demolished, not just because of its position in the heritage of Peterborough as a city, but on a personal basis since it is a significant landmark in our own lives."

Bill Hollowell, from Orton Waterville: "If the Great Northern Hotel is to be demolished to make room for yet more hideously unattractive modern buildings and car parking in the vicinity of the railway station that would be an act of crass stupidity.

"It would prove conclusively that not all the lunatics are in the asylum, but are beavering away over their drawing boards, intent on removing another of the city's few remaining architectural jewels for what they laughingly consider to be progress.

"At the end of the day, the final decision will rest with the city council. When it is called upon to consider the plans I hope its officers and members – who claim to have our best interests at heart – will block any proposal that advocates demolition and insist upon a scheme which retains the Great Northern Hotel as the jewel in the crown of that particular part of town."

Gerry Wilding: "Why is it this council and its officers want to destroy everything that is goood about this city? First it was the Brewery Tap and now the Great Northern, both unique in their own way, and replace them with buildings no one wants.

"We have enough empty shops in the city already.

"This is about over-ambitous councillors' egos and their legacy. When M&S anchors North Westgate (because no one else will), the Queensgate store will likely close.

That will be the end for Bridge Street, and as for the so-called South Bank development, it can't get off the drawing board. The station development is about providing travellers with a terminus that works and that doesn't require the knocking down of one of the few remaining railway hotels.

"Have the guts to tell your commercial partners how the people of Peterborough want OUR city developed that means including some of our better buildings in future developments."

Phil Knight, from Netherton: "If the Great Northern Hotel is demolished to 'drive forward growth in Peterborough', then why don't we give Opportunity Peterborough the free hand they obviously want and allow them to demolish the cathedral as well?

"They can then turn the city into what it has aspired to be for so long – a giant, anonymous shopping centre-cum-office block of no interest to outsiders except those purely interested in economic statistics.

"There seems to be a general rule in Peterborough that any establishment that offers character or taste or interest should be demolished, lest it should encourage an outbreak of culture or inward tourism.

"And while we are at it, how about giving us a profile of Opportunity Peterborough, who they are, and what their vision is.

The full article contains 568 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 4

  • Last Updated: 10 January 2008 12:03 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Stuart B,

P Boro 10/01/2008 14:00:45
I had my honeymoon night there so does have fond memories for me. I still don't think it is that much of a 'landmark' building. If people where bothered about preserving history they should have kept the original station (instead of that box now in its place)and not let the hidious extension to be slapped onto the back of the Gret Northern hotel. I'm sure we'd interest more people in coming to the city (presuming this is intention) If they could see a new state of the art shopping centre which would link to the city centre instead of an old looking hotel.
2

vialli23,

stamford 10/01/2008 15:19:42
I had the best ever night of dirty passion there and will be sorry to see it go
3

City Centre Resident,

10/01/2008 23:18:45
I am getting really sick of the luddites.. hmmm, I know lets go for the "other" £500M development plan that wants to save the Brewery tap etc... get with the program... Peterborough needs to progress and the more protesting that goes on the more the developers take their cash elsewhere... architecture is one thing but a thriving economic centre is what we want, if we can retain some individuality then great but if we have to sacrifice a few buildings then so be it... maybe if we all protest enough we can advertise our city as the, "best 1970's town in all of England"!!
4

All tog,

Peterborough 22/01/2008 16:54:37
I agree that the Great Northern Hotel should be kept as is. The thing to change is the eyesores of multistory carparks, the station and former goods yards. With modern building techniques using Insulating Concrete Forms, energy saving buildings of strength with any facing (modern or older to match the style of this hotel of character) can be created. The methods could also be used to a create sloping roof to a new building to extend parkland and lead to a bridge with great views. New innovative and stylish developments could be created further along to suit the Station needs, and give far better transport road links without piling everything so close to the shopping centre bottleneck.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.