Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Video: Drivers put lives at risk by ignoring crossing patrols



View Video
Download Video

Video

An interview with Clair Winterton
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 September 2008
BULLYING motorists are putting lives at risk by refusing to stop to allow school children to cross the road.
During the last school year, a total of 81 drivers were reported to Cambridgeshire police for ignoring requests to stop by school crossing patrollers.

But it is thought this is just the tip of the iceberg, with six motorists for every one reported to police getting away.

And the city's small band of school crossing patrollers have also revealed a horrifying spate of intimidation by impatient motorists.
The worrying details have been released by Peterborough City Council, which has launched a high profile "Stop means Stop" campaign to cut the number of drivers breaking the law by refusing to stop for school crossing patrollers.

At its worst, some motorists have accelerated their cars, swerving at the last moment to avoid the patroller in the road.

Others have threatened the patroller with
physical violence, while some have met requests to stop with a volley of obscene and threatening language.

A number of drivers have tried to intimidate the patroller and children by edging their vehicles towards those crossing the road while also loudly revving their engines.

In all cases the vehicle registration numbers of all those motorists were passed to police who sent out warning letters to the culprits.
Failure to stop for a school crossing patrol could result in a court conviction with a £1,000 fine and three penalty points.

The council's school crossing patrol officer, Julia Potkins, said: "This is not acceptable behaviour.

"The patrollers are giving up their free time to help school children and adults to cross the road in safety .

She added: "The job of crossing children safely over busy roads at peaks times already has its risks.

"These drivers are putting the lives not only of the patrollers at risk but also pedestrians, children as well as adults."
"It is quite shocking."

The new campaign, run jointly by the city council and the Eastern Region Road Safety Group, will involve placing large adverts on the back of buses, radio messages, display boards near schools as well as stickers and leaflets that will be available at schools, doctors and dentists across the city.

A spokeswoman for Cambridgeshire police said: "We have issued warning letters to the 81 motorists involved.

"The school crossing patrollers are there for a reason – to help children and adults cross the road safely to school. Motorists who refuse to stop are putting the lives of others at risk.
"Where there are persistent problems of requests to stop being ignored by drivers, police officers can carry out the patroller's duties."

The full article contains 447 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 September 2008 9:40 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

initonit,

Peterborough 12/09/2008 12:54:54
Motorists who ignore crossing patrols put children's lives at risk. It's time for motorists to realise they are in charge of a lethal weapon and harsher penalties will deter them from committing such offences in the first place - so a life ban from driving for offence such as ignoring a crossing patrol, drink-driving and speedin more than 10mph above the speed limit is called for on the first offence - it's the only way to stamp it out.
2

Lazy Daisy,

12/09/2008 13:19:43
If drivers are that upset about the patrols, why don't they leave home half an hour earlier and avoid them altogether? The patrols are only there for 30 mins before and 30 mins after school. It's not rocket science, is it?
3

fenman,

12/09/2008 13:41:15
I agree, it's not rocket science, Lazy Daisy, but you are assuming these "drivers" have some intelligence!
4

Lazy Daisy,

12/09/2008 16:15:38
Apologies for my erroneous assumptions! Perhaps they are using dicing with children's lives as entertainment or sport. Cretins.
5

GJH,

12/09/2008 16:24:09
In Yorkshire some crossing patrollers were experimenting with new signs that have a digital video camera in its pole, making it much easier to get the details of the impatient driver. Time to make them more widespread.

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/Lollipop-cameras-to-cut-crossing.4036726.jp

(actually posted on a sister site to this ET one, so the reporters need to cross-reference their stories)
6

lonelygoatherd,

12/09/2008 23:24:31
I support the video camera idea. It would be possible to buy in bulk at under £200 each. The first motorist fined on each one would pay for the equipment, thereafter it would be pure profit. It would have the advantage over speed cameras that it would identify the criminally and deliberately stupid. Footage (including clearly identifiable mugshots) could be sold to the TV channels in the manner of "Police, Camera, Action", but to act as a modern version of the stocks.
PS I'm not a fascist, honest!
7

DonB,

Peterborough 14/09/2008 12:42:53
If the police are to eradicate or attempt to eradicate this criminal activity, they would all be stuck indoors 24/7 filling in government forms. Such is the soviet style government we have to endure.
My response to this would be half a brick through the windscreen of all those who refuse to stop for children, but then, that would bring the police force down on me like a ton of bricks.
8

ivehadmysay,

14/09/2008 16:05:01
HUM I wonder how these imbeciles would feel if their children or family members were subjected to this intimidation and utter lack of consideration. Maybe the way to deal with them would be to make them take the longest route to and from work so they miss out school routes totally. And yes i most certainly think they should be prosecuted (maybe serving as a school crossing patroller for their community service)and a speech as to why their time and impatience is more important than the lifes they obviously care so little for.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.