Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bush is a 'symbol of rail neglect'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 July 2008
Jonny Muir
A buddleia in full bloom or a symbol of under-investment in Peterborough's railway network?
Commonly known as Butterfly Bush, the buddleia is growing out of cracks in the brickwork of the East Coast Main Line bridge that crosses the River Nene.

As pretty as it may be, railway enthusiast Rev Richard Paten believes the shrub is a glaring example of "neglected maintenance".

But Network Rail says that is not the case and the plant has bloomed because Peterborough has seen plenty of rain in recent months.

Mr Paten, who founded Nene Valley Railway and purchased the line's first steam locomotive, which was named City of Peterborough, said: "It may only be a buddleia, but that buddleia is a symbol of the relative lack of investment in the East Coast Main Line in Peterborough. Its presence implies that the viaduct is poorly maintained.

"Not only is it a potential safety issue, but it does not inspire confidence in the city. At a time when we are trying to encourage greater use of the railways and less of cars, it does not give much confidence when people see the lack of maintenance of what is Britain's second most important train line."

Rev Paten, who is the founder and chairman of nearby Railworld, added: "Railworld is trying to promote a 21st century rail showcase and sustainable transport centre, as well as having plans to develop a TransEco centre. The 'buddleia line' is a poor gateway for those developments."

The buddleia first appeared in the same place in 2004 when Rev Paten claimed the bridge would not look out of place in a "poverty-stricken country".

A spokesman for Network Rail said: "Recent high rainfall across the region has accelerated the growth of vegetation in and around the local area.

"This bridge will be inspected shortly, as part of Network Rail's ongoing maintenance programme, and then appropriate remedial measures will be taken.

"If any member of the community has a concern over the condition of any rail assets that we own and manage, we encourage them to contact the Network Rail National Helpline directly on 08457 11 41 41."

The full article contains 363 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 July 2008 11:46 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Paul33,

23/07/2008 12:57:12
Suggest Rev Paten turns his attention to RAILWORLD which remains the most embarrassing "visitor attraction" in the city - by a very long way !

I'd rather stare at a butterfly bush than waste good money looking at rusty railway wagons in a scrapyard !
2

KiwiinPboro,

23/07/2008 15:08:55
Well said Paul. Railworld is a disgrace. I had some friends come to Peterborough recently and could not understand why it was a tourist attraction.
3

captainsawdust,

23/07/2008 15:47:58
agree

he stopped people using the railworld bridge over the nene too so now people have to walk an extra mile to go over at asda's to go to the hospital, he need's sacking to lets have a clear out of "JOBS WORTHS" in the peterbouorgh area name and shame them !

anyone up for it !

4

Cherrypops,

p.boro 23/07/2008 16:54:33
your all correct, the guy is a joke! its a god damn bush!! get over yourself!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.