Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

£4.75m to cut congestion at Peterborough's worst accident blackspot



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
11 August 2008
CONGESTION at the Eye roundabout, a notorious Peterborough bottleneck will be eased by a £4.75 million traffic light scheme.
It is hoped that the project will end years of traffic misery on the Eye roundabout, which is used by up to 40,000 cars every day.

Beginning in the spring, the scheme will see traffic lights installed on each of the roundabout's four arms – Frank Perkins Parkway, Parnwell Way, Peterborough Road and Paston Parkway, while pedestrians will be able to cross the roads at a series of toucan crossings.

Today, the city council's head of transport and engineering David Farquhar said the project would improve the safety record of a roundabout that The Evening Telegraph has previously revealed to be Peterborough's fourth worst accident blackspot, with 37 accidents between 2004 and 2006.

What do you think about plans for traffic lights at the Eye roundabout?
Comment below, email us: news@ peterboroughtoday.co.uk or telephone the newsdesk 01733 588719.
-------------------------------------

While the project has been acclaimed by city councillors in Dogsthorpe and East wards, Welland Residents' Association says the scheme will increase congestion and lead to frustration because vehicles will have to come to a grinding halt at traffic lights.

Members are convinced that a footbridge spanning the Paston Parkway, connecting Eye Road to a KFC restaurant, a Somerfield supermarket and a petrol station – as opposed to a toucan crossing – would do the job of keeping pedestrians safe and ensuring that the flow of traffic is not interrupted.

Because the £4.75 million project does not include a proposal for a bridge, the residents' association has pledged to raise the £1.9 million needed to fund a structure.

Spokeswoman Anne Clipston said: "Imagine the traffic jams caused by toucan crossings at every junction? By proposing a bridge, we're doing the council a favour."

Dogsthorpe councillor Adrian Miners said: "I have sympathy for what they are saying, but I live in the real world. A bridge is the utopia but it's not going to happen in the near future.

"The signalisation should come sooner rather than later. The road is a deathtrap at the moment and traffic lights will give pedestrians time to cross without having to dart over the road."

East ward councillor Marion Todd said: "It is a bad junction, a horrendous junction. People crossing the road there are dicing with death. The crossings will make the area safer for pedestrians and will hopefully not have an adverse impact on traffic."

Mr Farquhar said the council would consider constructing a bridge if Welland Residents' Association successfully raised the cash.

In peak hours, up to 5,000 vehicles use the Eye roundabout, and there are an estimated 68 million vehicle movements in the area every year.

Welland Residents' Association will kickstart its campaign to raise £1.9 million at a public meeting at the Blue Mobile, next to the Charteris Centre, Welland, on Monday, starting at 7pm.

The full article contains 497 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 August 2008 11:55 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

waynesill,

11/08/2008 12:28:13
Cut congestion! this scheme will make it even worse. I have yet to see a roundabout controlled by traffic lights that eases the flow of traffic.

£4.75m surely there is a better option than this to help the traffic flow quicker?
2

Lukey1,

11/08/2008 12:39:52
Waynesil, have you not been on the new hampton roundabout, in my eyes, that is alot better since lights have been installed.
3

Outcast,

Using Ubuntu 11/08/2008 12:39:59
I live in Westwood but I'll chuck a tenner in the pot for a footbridge over the parkway.

They are forgetting that some motorists WILL "run" the light. That light will be a Toucan light meaning that pedestrians WILL be crossing.

@ Waynesill

Since the introduction of lights at the hampton doughnut it has helped immensely. The "dodderers" can now get across speeding up the flow behind them as well as the heavy trucks.

Our returning eastern fleet no longer has to go along the 47 and down Nene Parkway to get to our depot in Woodston, easing the tailbacks even further at Hampton interchange.
4

Outcast,

Using Ubuntu 11/08/2008 12:43:27
Damn.. Pressed submit before entering closing comment..

Traffic light control is all well and good as long as they turn the damn things OFF when off peak.
5

lonelygoatherd,

11/08/2008 12:56:15
This council's traffic department is run by a bunch of unthinking cheapskates. Several years ago, when they built the Newborough Guntons Road "calming" traffic islands, I asked if they were putting in illuminated bollards. "No, we are saving money". They put up black plastic posts with two half inch wide red stripes - invisible in the rain in the dark. Within six hours of taking down the barriers around the new islands they had to put them back because someone had not seen them in the dark and ran over them. And so we got illuminated bollards - at the additional cost of removing the black ones and a traffic accident.
6

James_Werrington,

Peterborough 11/08/2008 12:57:59
Millions have just been spent widening Paston Parkway so traffic can flow well and people don't use rat runs instead. Any development mustn't change this.
The phasing would have to be well in favour of people going from the Paston to Frank Perkins parkways.

If there's such a demand for a KFC, KFC can build a new outlet with their own money or provide a delivery service. Don't waste millions of pounds that could go on something worthwhile.
7

lonelygoatherd,

11/08/2008 13:03:55
Can the Traffic department publish a cost benefit analysis? This should include the costs of at least two pedestrian deaths on a toucan crossing system which would not happen if a footbridge was built. Sooner or later, deaths will happen. Then they can explain to the relatives that the deceased's lives were not worth the expenditure of £950,000 each.

Go on ET reporters, show what you are made of. Lets see that question asked and published in detail on the front page!! I would rather see that story than a headline that says "Death Tragedy at Roundabout".
8

LJ.,

11/08/2008 14:46:59
I'd like to know who dreams up these costs. I mean £4.75 million for a set of traffic lights?? and £1.9 million for a pedestrian bridge that people are *unlikely* to use, note example at Walton where they have now installed a traffic light crossing nearly underneath the pedestrian bridge that people are too idle to use.
9

Alan Yaxley,

Yaxley 11/08/2008 16:59:24
All this stop start traffic stuff will just increase journey times as well as increase pollution and of course our petrol bills.
10

pbt,

Werrington 11/08/2008 17:00:54
You only have to look at the queues on the Nene Parway, up to the Hampton roundabout at the evening rush hour, to see what a mess they are.

The recent failure of the traffic lights at the Rhubard Bridge roundabout, proved that traffic flows better without the traffic lights.

The Eye roundabout needs a flyover for the majority of traffic heading east on the A47, and a merging dual carriageway on the A47 for both streams of traffic

Pedestrian crossing at roundabouts are a death trap. Pedestrians and motorised vehicles should, and must, be kept seperate at all times.

PBT
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.