DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
  • 19/06/13
  • 12°C to 23°C Light rain
  • Peterborough 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Thursday 20 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low12°c

    Wind

    From North east

    Speed12 mph

    Friday 21 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High18°c

    Low12°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed13 mph

    Saturday 22 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low11°c

    Wind

    From South west

    Speed23 mph

    Sunday 23 Jun

    Light showers

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low10°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed21 mph

    Monday 24 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed16 mph

  • Like us
  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

MPs dispute property values

News from the Peterborough Telegraph - peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news, @peterboroughtel on Twitter

News from the Peterborough Telegraph - peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news, @peterboroughtel on Twitter

Peterborough MP Stewart Jackson is one of a number of MPs in discussions with the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) over valuations on properties.

Dozens of MPs are understood to be unhappy with judgments relating to properties. A directive, confirmed to the PT by IPSA this week, states that MPs were given a two year “transition period” between August 2010 and August 2012 in which they were allowed to continue claiming allowances on mortgage interest payments on their second homes.

IPSA told MPs that those who claimed for mortgage interest during those two years would be liable to pay a ‘nominal’ lump sum ‘capital gain’ at the end of the period, if IPSA judged that the value of their second home had risen during those two years. This payment would have to be made even if the MP has not sold that property, meaning that any “capital gain” would be tied up in equity and would have to be paid out of MPs’ own pockets.

A number of MPs are understood to be questioning the IPSA judgement and the valuations placed on properties which, in some cases, it is believed do not necessarily reflect market values. The PT understands that Mr Jackson’s only current home is in Peterborough.

 
 
 

Back to the top of the page