Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Warehouse plans could bring 5,400 jobs


Warehouses covering area size of 135 football pitches planned on land next to Stanground

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 March 2008
Email Jonny Muir
A WAREHOUSE complex which would create 5,400 jobs has been earmarked for a vast swathe of countryside on Peterborough's south-east fringe.
Called Magna Park, the seven warehouses – covering an area equivalent to 135 football pitches – would be built between Park Farm, Stanground, and the railway tracks of the Nuneaton to Felixstowe line.

A rail freight intercharge would be erected on the "inland port" site so goods destined for major companies, including Asda and John Lewis, could be unloaded.

In the next three days, Gazeley, the logistics giant behind the scheme, is expected to post 6,000 letters to Stanground residents revealing its intention to build the four million sq ft complex.

What's your reaction to the Magna Park plans? Is it needed? Is it in the right place?
Comment below, email us: news@peterboroughtoday.co.uk or telephone the newsdesk 01733 555111.
-------------------------------------

Stretching across 135 hectares of farmland, Magna Park would abut the Nene Washes conservation area, and would include a wetland park to the west of the development.

With 1,525 homes and a dual-carriageway earmarked for land south of Oakdale Avenue, the two schemes would see Stanground – once a village on Peterborough's periphery – encircled by new developments.

Although a Gazeley spokesman said the firm had a "desire to do things properly", the proposal could come up against a wall of opposition.
Stanground Central councillors Brian Rush and Irene Walsh and Stanground East councillor Janet Wilkinson believe there will be a furious reaction when the plans are made public.

Among a raft of concerns are increased traffic, the possibility of flooding, the impact on the water table, the disturbance of wildfowl habitats and the exacerbation of Peterborough's low-skilled economy by building more warehouses.

Cllr Rush said: "People in Stanground bought houses to look over the open aspect of this land. In future, they will be looking out over warehouses. When residents find out about this complex there will be uproar."

Cllr Wilkinson added: "People living in Park Farm would lose the view across what is currently farmland. It will change that part of Stanground."

Cllr Marco Cereste, the third Stanground Central member, said he could not comment on the scheme because he sits on Peterborough City Council's planning and environmental protection committee, but speaking generally about warehousing he said: "It is a fallacy to believe that most distribution jobs are lowly paid.

"They can be highly skilled and highly paid."

North West Cambridgeshire MP Shailesh Vara said: "Jobs are always welcome but it is important that they fit in with the local community. It is also important that a development of this size is done with the full and proper consultation of the local community, particularly taking account of local concerns and anxieties."

Chief executive of Peterborough Chamber of Commerce John Bridge said the rail freight interchange would have wider implications for the region, including removing traffic from the perennially clogged A14.

He said: "We have to recognise that Peterborough is ideally placed on the crossroads of rail and road routes. One of the main benefits would be taking freight off the A14 – something that would have a positive impact on the entire region."

READ ET COMMENT:5,400 jobs but at what cost and to who?

A Gazeley spokesman said that there would be a future increase in rail freight between Nuneaton and Felixstowe following a Government decision to upgrade the line.

It would mean that a regional freight interchange – made up of railway sidings and a container yard – would be built on the northern boundary of Magna Park.

The spokesman said: "People do not like change but we are committed to working with residents. As with all things, there are benefits and costs. We hope to prove that the benefits will outweigh the costs."

Plans for Magna Park are included in the city councils Core Strategy – one of the documents which will eventually replace the Local Plan.
While the Core Strategy notes that Peterborough is seen as an ideal location for a rail-connected distribution centre, possible disadvantages listed include the impact on the existing natural environment and the site's proximity to a flood zone.

However, in a sign of intent, a Peterborough rail freight interchange has been included in a Government short list of major transport projects in the West Midlands.

Magna Park factfile
Magna Park is expected to create 4,000 jobs on-site, 800 jobs off-site and 600 jobs during construction. The 4 million sq ft complex stretching across 135 hectares of farmland will include:

Seven warehouses distribution centre covering an area equivalent to 135 football pitches;
A new rail freight intercharge ((with railway sidings and container yard) where goods can be unloaded;
A park with lakes to provide a buffer for nearby residents;
A wetland area to protect against floods.
Work to build a road bypassing
Stanground, between junction 3a of the Fletton Parkway and Whittlesey Road, is already underway, but Gazeley wants the bypass to be duelled along its entire route.
As part of the development, a new roundabout will be built to the north of Horsey Hill fort, turning a stretch of Toll Road into a minor road.
Gazeley's contract with site operators will forbid heavy goods vehicles from using the local road network other than the new Stanground bypass.
As the site occupies a flood plain, in order to mitigate increased run-off, much of the site will be given over to lakes and a wetland park.
Magna Park would be in operation for 24 hours a day and "lighting will be required to permit safe working after dark".
A full assessment on surrounding heritage features, potential archaeology, flood risk, ecology and noise impact will be carried out prior to the submission of a planning application.
Gazeley has also attempted to reduce the visual impact of its buildings by using a graded colour cladding, which it claims helps the structures blend into the background.

The full article contains 996 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 March 2008 12:30 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2 3 4 5 6
1

,

12/03/2008 12:06:09
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

dread ,

12/03/2008 12:13:13
the english want to eat fish and chips and watch telly so we need hard working people and they have to come from somewhere.viva la polish
3

waynesill,

12/03/2008 12:30:53
nnooop, I am sure that they will be able to squeeze a few more into Millfiled or maybe Hampton with 8 to a house shouldn't be too much of a problem.
4

Roger Hughes,

Park Farm 12/03/2008 14:26:34
I hate to point out the bleeding obvious, but has'nt March already got all of these facilities, remember the town was built bedcause of the railways, would the increase in employment in a rural area not be more beneficial than ruining a beautiful flood plain that has scientific protection orders on it.
5

waynesill,

12/03/2008 14:36:29
Good point Roger don't know whether they still have the facilities or not, but don't forget Whitemoor has been built close by and they wouldn't want to keep the criminals awake by building so close to them, c'mon think about their human rights!!

No but seriously this planned development is not needed in the area, keep this land green we keep building on excellent farmland no wonder there is a wheat shortage at the moment soon we will have no land for anything to be grown or grazed upon.
Unfortunately, like everything else nowadays I am sure that this development has already been given the go-ahead in principle and there is nothing you, I or anybody else can do about it. Sad fact only the fat cats get fatter oh and the planners / councillors who will push for this to happen.
6

James_Werrington,

Peterborough 12/03/2008 15:51:25
Peterborough, the mimimum wage capital of Britain.
7

Robert De Niro,

12/03/2008 16:06:53
I agree with you. Its not needed and certainly not as more warehousing. We need to be trying to encourage hi-tech/science companies to move to Peterborough instead. I think it will go ahead whether we want it or even need it. However, if its too late, why not force them to pay for the dual carriageway from Stanground to Whittlesey including a bridge over Kings Dyke??
8

stan,

Peterborough 12/03/2008 16:17:27
Only in Peterbrough can the news of 5000 jobs be met with 'where will the poles live' (maybe the unemployed scrotes like the divot on tv last night will get off their backsides for a job indoors?) and 'minimum wage capital'. And pelase dont tell me anyone moved to Stanground for the views....
9

Duncann,

Farcet 12/03/2008 16:46:52
yet more concrete, the planners are turning peterborough into a horrible place, once peterborough was surounded by villages and fields and wildlife. it was a place where we knew our neighbours and would never be stuck in traffic jams. More cheap house being built, stanground and farcet join as one, losing the identity of our village, there is no real plan but build more house, creat more traffic jams, no schools, no decent shops, its an absolute disgrace, noone except the planners want any expansion, knock on every door, noone wants it, we should stand up for our rights, supposed to be a democtratic society!
10

Fletton Resident,

Peterborough 12/03/2008 17:49:08
Why don't we just be done with it and change the name of Peterborough to Warehouse City! Having lived in Peterborough for over 30 years I am absolutely devestated to see what it has become. Yes jobs and houses are crucial to the success of the city but every single area of space seems to be getting filled in with houses and the only jobs we are able to offer our future generations are in warehouses. As a city we are losing our identity and at this point in time I am doubtful we will ever get it back. Immigration is fine, we are an accepting city, but there has to be a limit on it. Lots of young professional people I know have already moved out, how long will it be before the rest of us go and all will be left of Peterborough are warehouses. How sad that somewhere that used to be such a nice place to live has got to this stage. I hope the residents of Peterborough as a whole will stand up and be counted and do something before it is too late and our city is lost forever.
Prev
1
2 3 4 5 6

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.