Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Peterborough City Council website

Villagers worried by windfarm plans

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 July 2009
VILLAGERS have raised concerns about plans to build a windfarm "near their homes".
Some residents of Turves, near Whittlesey, claim the five 100m high turbines proposed at land north of Burnthouse Farm are too close to their properties and will disturb the calm of their peaceful neighbourhood.

They are also worried that during w
inter falling shards of ice from the blades of the turbines, which are about 400 metres away from houses, could injure residents.

But bosses of the scheme allayed fears by saying a state-of-the-art ice detection device, which shuts off when it senses ice, had been installed.

They also said the windfarm was smaller than others nearby, and would be vital for meeting green energy needs – powering 5,600 homes.

But Tracy Hough (33), from Burnt House Road, said she was still not convinced by the plans, which have been submitted to Fenland District Council.

She said: “Turves is a small village, it is a quiet place.

“We have only days left to object to the turbines that, at this distance, can have health effects, safety effects, effects on our quality of life, with heavy plant using our roads and noise once the things are built.

“There is plenty of open space for turbines away from villages.

“You will look and think, ‘oh that’s a long way away’, and the village has been made to look so small, but in reality, it is a field away.

“And these things can throw 20kgs of ice in cold condition up to a distance of 550m.”

But director of Fivestone Nick Sutton, said 18 months of work had been carried out to ensure the windfarm ticked all the right boxes.

He also said residents had been consulted, an extensive noise survey had been done and the heights of the turbines reduced by 25m.

He said: “We held a public forum at Doddington Village Hall at the weekend. Out of the people we saw, 60 per cent of those questioned were in favour.

“You can’t please everyone, but there is a serious need for renewable energy.

“We are told the lights will go off in the next seven years if we can’t produce our own power.

“We know this is a good area for a small scheme, but we have been trying to tick every single box.”

He said there was still time for residents to make their voices heard, with the application set to be decided upon by July 29 at the earliest.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 July 2009 6:19 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

DonB,

Peterborough 04/07/2009 12:20:45
These windmills are a waste of space. It is yet another brown envelope job this government are famous for.
2

Alien in Orton,

04/07/2009 21:59:44
I would rather see a wind farm on my doorstep than something that resembles Sizewell A or B. We should be harvesting this free energy and I believe that solar panels in roofs should be standard UK build too. Fossil fuels are dangerous and are killing the planet.
3

Mithras,

Peterborough 05/07/2009 09:21:47
Coal fired, nuclear, oil or wind? Take your choice we all use electricty. What is your preference? Wind does seem the lesser evil but the sad truth is that no one wants it on their door step!
4

Fenbeagle,

Lincolnshire 05/07/2009 17:28:07
We use enormous amounts of energy. Wind currently produces 1.5% of our electricity. (As a percentage of our total energy requirement, it would be a very much smaller figure.) This figure conceals the fact, that on days of low wind they are unable to produce any electricity (although still requiring electricity themselves.) Denmark, with a very much lower energy requirement than the UK, has built the largest number of turbines, for the size of its population, and has, therefore been claiming it can produce 20% of its electricity from Wind power. A new report from the Renewable Energy Foundation, claims the reality is different, and they have only been able to integrate 7% (and this by linking with Germany.)
We all use energy, but that energy, mostly comes to us from burning carbon, or Uranium (you can choose wind, if you prefer, but it will still come to you, mostly from burning carbon and uranium.)
There are issues from building large Industrial windturbines too close to peoples houses. Advice from around the world suggest they should be no nearer to peoples homes than 2 kilometres. England, like Scotland, should have a 2 kilometer planning advice recommendation, to that effect. And/Or, like Denmark, should have a law that gives compensation to house owners that wish to move away from Wind Turbines, and can prove that the Turbines have affected the house price...paid for by the owners of the Windfarm. The sad truth is, we have not, so far, done this.
5

StopTheWorldIWantToGetOff!,

06/07/2009 09:17:05
Mithras - I would welcome one to be built on my land.

Windmills have that marmite effect; you either love 'em or hate 'em
6

Fenbeagle,

Lincolnshire 06/07/2009 10:02:29
StoptheWorld....Except,that, in the case of Marmite, you do actualy have the choice. And, if it makes you, ill,you can stop using it. Marmite (probably) does not, have an effect on everyone else around you either.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.