Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Stanground warehouse protests



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
31 March 2008
DOZENS of people protesting about a proposed development in Stanground converged on the town hall in Peterborough this morning (March 31st).
Councillors had to delay a planned cabinet meeting so the unexpected numbers could be accommodated inside.

The 50-strong group of people, all from Stanground, ranged from mums with pushchairs to pensioners, and congregated outside the town hall, in Bridge Street.

They were wearing T-shirts displaying the message Stand up for Stanground on the front and Say no to Magna Park across the back.

They were protesting about plans to build an "inland port" comprising seven warehouses and a rail freight interchange on 135 hectares of countryside between Park Farm, Stanground, and Hanson brickworks, in Whittlesey.

A spokesman for the residents group said: "We asked people to come here today to show their support for our campaign and objection to the proposals which would be bad for the area."

Warehousing giant Gazeley estimates that Magna Park will create 5,400 jobs.

But residents in the area believe the development would be devastating for the community and ruin the countryside.

As well as covering countryside in concrete, residents are concerned about increased traffic, noise and light pollution, and the loss of wildlife habitats.

Stanground Central councillor Irene Walsh has publicly declared her opposition to the development.

Her decision to lobby the council not to include Magna Park in the Core Strategy – one of the documents which will dictate Peterborough's future growth – means she is likely to lose her vote on the issue if it comes to a full council meeting.

Related: Magna Park: Councillors release statement, 14th March.

Warehouse plans could bring 5,400 jobs, 12th March
.

The full article contains 281 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 March 2008 12:04 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

MGH,

31/03/2008 12:36:28
If the warehouse builders were to build a bridge over the railway line on the A605 I would not object, but if the gates are to be closed more than they are currently I think this would be a very bad idea for Whittlesey residents.
2

Lord Trenchards Brat,

Ex of Stanground 31/03/2008 16:13:40
The builders should complete the road/bridge links first to take the traffic outside of Stanground and Whittlesy which would include their own lorries when building the site.
3

Old Peterborezzz,

31/03/2008 21:00:13
Stopping investment in this fine city, well done, you should be proud
4

whirlwind,

31/03/2008 21:50:33
Bypass Stanground and Whittlesey,take freight off the road. Bring it on.Bad luck for Park Farm though,you bought a house with a view of the brick yards and Mccains, now you're going to get a warehouse.Seems a good swap to me!!!
5

Old Peterborezzz,

01/04/2008 07:15:39
AAh, so they're worried about their house prices are they?
I thought this would be another nimby inspired thing
6

Eastfield,

Parnwell 01/04/2008 09:32:52
The inland port will bring huge infrastructure improvements to the A605 and railway. People are stating about the use of land in Peterborough, however they should be aware that the land in question is shared between P'boro and Fenland. The level of big employers in this district is less than that of Peterborough and will further improve an area that has until recently been deprived. The development, however, must and will be sympathetic to the adjacent RAMSAR site the Whittlesey washes.

It is unfortunate for people who have bought in Park Farm, however, the economy needs jobs and their house prices will be kept artificially high by the managers/supervisors at these warehouses who may want to live close to work
7

KatyB,

Park Farm 01/04/2008 13:36:38
You are forgetting the size of the development - approx 135 football pitches worth! The area in question is on a flood plain which was flooded only last week. This development will not only affect Park Farm residents but anybody and everybody near to the River Nene which will undoubtedly flood more often as a result. There will also be a major impact on local wildlife too.
This is not just a case of NIMBY - we have already had wind farms and large mobile phone masts erected here in the last few years here which are not necessarily a problem. The negative environmental impact of 150 hectares of warehouses is, however, a huge problem for everyone in the district!
8

KatyB,

Park Farm 01/04/2008 13:39:04
Think also about the types of jobs created - not many managerial and supervisory roles I would argue! It will ultimately result in numerous unskilled, low paid, temporary jobs which Peterborough does not need. People are likely to only be employed on short term contracts as this is the nature of this type of work. The area already hosts hundreds of employees working at the successful brick factory. These jobs will be lost if the plans go ahead.
9

Eastfield,

01/04/2008 16:34:21
No, the Brick works will not be affected by this development. I think you are being disingenuous by saying all the jobs will be on short-term contracts. they won't. The building on the flood-plain will not be a problem, the Washes have plenty of capacity and will continue to be monitored. Park Farm is not unduly at risk from river flooding, so you should be alright even with the new development
10

KatyB,

Park Farm 06/04/2008 22:24:06
Thank you for putting my mind at rest by confirming that Park Farm "should be alright" from flooding if the development goes ahead. If you read my previous post, I was more concerned about the increased risk of flooding across the whole of Stanground and perhaps even further afield, not just Park Farm. The area in question was flooded only last week!
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.