Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Stanground warehouse developers 'will woo the public'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Paul Grinnell
Developers behind a £500 million rail-based warehouse hub in Peterborough are poised to begin a charm offensive to win over residents opposed to the plans.
Fearful homeowners in Stanground have already made clear by letter, an internet petition and through lobbying of their councillors their opposition to Gazeley's proposals for the Magna Park Peterborough development of about seven giant warehouses and
a rail interchange.

But Gazeley directors say they are determined to do all they can to persuade residents that the hub, which will cover four million square feet between Park Farm and the Nuneaton to Felixstowe railway line and create 5,400 jobs, will be good for the city.

What do you think?
Comment below, email us: news@ peterboroughtoday.co.uk or telephone the newsdesk 01733 555111.
-------------------------------------

Planning director Don Morgan said: "We have absolutely nothing to hide. The residents have asked a number of questions and we want to answer them all."

The company is in the process of printing a four-page letter that will be delivered to 6,000 homes towards the end of next month and which will give its response to objections raised.

That letter will be followed up by briefing sessions where residents will get a chance to talk to Gazeley representatives about the proposed development.

Two months ago, Gazeley sent out a two-page letter to residents explaining the proposals after news of the planned development was revealed by The Evening Telegraph.

Mr Morgan said: "We won't win every- one over but we feel this is the right and proper thing to do to give residents as much information as possible."

Concerns raised so far by residents include the spectre of extra traffic on the roads, the likelihood of flooding as the development will be built on the flood plain, disturbing wildlife habitats and the impact a large number of low skilled jobs will have on the city's economy.

Mr Morgan said an important feature of the development will be the use of a 150 metre to 200 metre strip of land between residents' homes and the development as a wet- land park with tree planting and landscaping plus access for the public. The warehouses will be built to high environmental friendly standards and the rail link is expected to remove about 75,000 lorries from the roads each year.

The company is also committed to ensuring the dualling of part of the Stanground bypass and is looking at possible links with the planned Peterborough university.

An outline planning application for the development is expected to be submitted to Peterborough City Council by the end of the year and it could take at least five years to complete the hub.

Chairman of the anti-Magna Par action group Stand Up For Stan- ground, Chris Harper, said: "People still have a lot of concerns about these proposals, particularly about increased traffic, light pollution and noise. We are encouraging people to find out more about the plans. We may not be able to stop it but perhaps we can negotiate to reduce the impact."

Stanground Central's councillor Irene Walsh said: "These proposals should not be part of Peterborough's growth agenda. As a city we can do better. We need something better than a park of warehouses to raise the standards of the city. Let's go for something with a more mixed skills base."



The full article contains 569 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 May 2008 12:28 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Joff,

Peterborough 28/05/2008 15:40:14
Dare I say it, Gazeley do seem to be doing a decent softly-softly approach to win over the residents but unless they're going to plant a tree line between them and the houses you won't get over the fact that people will be forced to stare at giant warehouses for years to come.

It's not that different to residents in Fletton that now can't sit in their back garden without being faced by an almighty blue IKEA box.

Maybe Gazeley could sweeten the deal by making monetary gestures to the residents? Money talks after all.
2

,

28/05/2008 16:00:19
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
3

trottz,

peterborough 28/05/2008 16:40:17
be aware residents of stanground that similar issues have been rasied by residents in other major UK cities that were against the plans laid out before them for huge housing projects.... the answer was to survey the residents posing as a concerned party, this "concerned party" then left & signed residents names against some papers saying how much they thought the plans would be an asset to their area after all.....cheating the whole way along & lets remember once its all up & built whatever inquiry takes place afterwards will be just a white wash.....as per.....

good luck to you all in the fight....

but you know in your heart this is already a foregone decision....

like central government, they've ALL got their noses stuck DEEP in the trough.....
4

captainsawdust,

28/05/2008 18:38:55
Build it !! Makes great sence im 100% behind it !!!!!!Well done Don for bring jobs into this area
5

yasmobile,

saffron walden 28/05/2008 20:25:27
while youre at it why dont you build a airport,and safari park.........its not needed and definatly not wanted.........DONT ALLOW IT TO GO AHEAD!!!!!!!!! peterbourgh youre killing yourself and you dont even no it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
6

,

29/05/2008 03:43:39
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
7

The Terminator,

Stanground 02/06/2008 16:18:06
I dont think that a monetary solution for residents is feasible here.
The developers are trying the "softly-softly" approach for the reason that they KNOW people will balk, and they want to know why so that they can build an efficient offensive.

Putting up a tree-line will NOT stop the fact that hundreds of lorries will now be using the area.
The "fact" that 75,000 lorries will no longer use the roads is mute in my opinion as there will now be hundres (nay thousands) of EXTRA lorries using the local area.

With local schools and nurseries surely the EXTRA traffic is an issue !!!
8

Chris Harper,

Park Farm 20/06/2008 19:04:36
You have until 5pm on 26th June - Please don't waste this vital opportunity to have your say.

Gazeley's latest colour brochure was basically the same as the original bar some shuffling and the predicted inclusion of just how they would get over some of our concerns but once again they failed to address the real issues preferring to rather just gloss over them.

What's now absolutely crucial to our campaign is for everyone to show their opposition individually to the inclusion of the Magna Park Development in the 'Peterborough Core Strategy Development Plan'. Please take the opportunity to use the on line service provided by PCC to comment on the 'Preferred Options'. We all need to show the council inspectorate that we mean business and will oppose this development at every opportunity.

If you haven't had a chance to read the 'Peterborough Core Strategy Development Plan' please use the link below.

http://consult.peterborough.gov.uk/portal/planning/peterborough/cs/cspo?pointId=36413

The email address for your comments is

planningpolicy@peterborough.gov.uk

You can also send in your views by post to the following address

Strategic Planning & Enabling
Strategic Growth & Development Service
Peterborough City Council
Bayard Place
Broadway
Peterborough
PE1 1HZ
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.