Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Special Report: How police investigated vote rigging offences


We discover the amazing amount of painstaking work it took by police to bring council election riggers to justice:

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
28 July 2008
THE conviction of former city mayor Raja Akhtar and ex-councillor Abdul Razaq brings to an end a massive police investigation which has seen six men convicted of electoral fraud in the past six months.
Operation Hooper has involved four years of work by a core team of Cambridgeshire detectives who trawled through more than 11,000 electoral documents and interviewed nearly 1,200 witnesses.

The £1 million investigation began in June 2004 after Peterborough City Council began receiving complaints from people who had arrived at polling stations to vote in the local elections, only to be told their ballots had already been cast by post.

The vast majority of complaints came from the city's Central ward, where electoral records showed the number of postal votes was far higher than in any other area.

In particular, the number of postal votes sent to away addresses – addresses other than voters' homes – was a cause for concern.

A total of 591 away address applications were made in the Central ward – more than 13 times higher than the next largest figure of just 44 in Paston.

Operation Hooper began with the seizure of thousands of electoral documents from the city council, and after the papers were painstakingly analysed by forensics officers and a handwriting expert, six suspects were identified.

Detective Sergeant Shaun Sutton, the deputy senior investigation officer in the case, said: "The initial stages of the investigation took many months, and from the analysis of the documents, we could see there were a number which contained the same handwriting style.

"This then led us to the six people who were to become the subject of the inquiry, and it was only then that the full scope of the investigation became apparent."

Of the nine candidates who stood for election in the Central ward at the June 2004 election, five were brought before the courts in connection with illegal activity, including two of the three successful candidates.

Despite being ousted at the election, Mohammed Choudhary, who became Peterborough's first Asian mayor in 1996, was convicted of four counts of forgery following a four-month trial which concluded in February.

He was sentenced to nine months in jail in April, though he has since been released.

Labour candidate Maqbool Hussein and party aide Tariq Mahmood were jailed alongside Choudhary after being convicted at the same trial.

Mahmood, who was found guilty of 14 counts of forgery, was given a 15-month jail sentence and is still in prison, while Hussein was given a three-month term after being found guilty of four counts of forgery.

Former mayor Akhtar was found guilty of one count of forgery on Friday, while fellow Conservative candidate Razaq was convicted of six charges the previous day.

Both won their seats in the 1994 election.

Failed Tory candidate Mohammed Khaliq was due to be tried alongside Akhtar and Razaq, but pleaded guilty to two counts of forgery on the day the month-long trial was due to start.

All three have been told by Judge Alasdair Daroch that a jail term is likely when they are sentenced later in the year.

The full article contains 529 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 28 July 2008 11:14 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

WE ALL LOVE DREAD,

28/07/2008 15:03:30
so these people are well respected in the comunity. I feel for this comunity having crooks as there leaders no wonder the millfield area is in such poor state these thieves take everything and put nothing back why does this comunity not wake and see that these people are common criminals and deserve no respect what so ever are there no honest decent people left....
2

,

28/07/2008 15:14:03
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
3

Outcast,

Using Ubuntu 28/07/2008 16:04:34
Agree with the Above.
4

A Seymour,

28/07/2008 16:29:03
How many more criminals are there in local Pottyboro politics? They all deserve what is coming to them. Of course at this is Pottyboro in a few years they will be re-elected and given a Deputy Mayor role or perhaps Mayor.
5

,

28/07/2008 16:47:43
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
6

Dan Jackson,

28/07/2008 16:51:41
Does anyone known any criminals out there? Ws wondering if we could get them to stand at the next elections and show what a joke this city's council is.
7

Greg Williams,

Woodston 28/07/2008 16:56:22
I can't really get that excited about this. So they forged a few signatures on postal ballots - most of these candidates didn't even win their seats and if they did their punishment was to become a Labour councillor in a Tory-dominated council.
Surely, one million pounds of tax payers' money could be better spent in Peterborough - invest that money in bobbies for Millfield and it would be the safest place in the country.
8

,

28/07/2008 16:59:54
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
9

A Seymour,

28/07/2008 22:06:48
Greg Williams These guys wre tory candidates not Labour.
10

,

28/07/2008 22:55:53
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.