Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

SATS exam marking branded shambolic



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
18 July 2008
THERE was anger in Peterborough schools today over a SATS test marking shambles that has left primary school children bewildered and disappointed.
The mix-up over results even showed that 89 pupils out of 90 had been absent when children at one school sat a maths paper.

This follows a national uproar after the exams were marked for the first time by the private firm ETS Europe, which has been awarded a five-year, £156 million contract by the Government.

Problems began last week when schools were told the results of the Key Stage 2 SATS, which are taken by 10 and 11-year-olds, would be delayed by a week. And when they did arrive, many schools began reporting major glitches.

In Peterborough, 10 schools awaiting Key Stage 2 results did not have all their papers for English tests returned, five schools did not receive all their maths results and two did not receive all their science results.

At Abbotsmede Community Primary School in Eastfield, Peterborough, errors were made in the marking of science tests which resulted in 10 per cent of pupils being given lower scores than they should have been.

Furious headteacher Brenda Wright said: "The children in year 6 have worked for the whole year to learn as much as they can for these tests.

"To not consider them important enough to make sure the system is correct is absolutely appalling.

"It is denigrating all the hard work the children have put in, and is just not appropriate."

Also unhappy is Margaret Sargent, headteacher at Alderman Jacobs Primary School in Whittlesey, where test results arrived a week later than promised – and when they were finally posted online they were riddled with howlers.

Mrs Sargent said they contained so many errors she was forced to keep them back from pupils

She said: "Lots of children were missing and the results website was showing children as absent when they had in fact taken the tests.

What do you think?
Comment below, email us: news@ peterboroughtoday.co.uk or telephone the newsdesk 01733 588719.
-------------------------------------

"We had problems with English and problems with science, but the really bizarre thing was that out of 90 children who did one maths paper, it showed 89 were absent.

Mrs Sargent said scathingly: "It has been quite shambolic.

"As a teacher it is an appalling situation because the children worked very hard towards their SATS, but they have still not had their results.

"As a taxpayer, I have got some serious concerns about the company which is carrying out this operation and is being paid vast sums of money to do so."

Results for Key Stage 3 SATS were expected on Monday but are not due until at least next week.

The situation has also alarmed many parents whose children are set to chose vital options which will influence the future of their education.

One of them, Mr Kevin Banks (44), from Orton Malborne, says he is concerned his 14-year-old stepson, an Orton Longueville School pupil, will not get his results before the school closes on Wednesday.

He said: "They have no idea when we will receive them.

"It is a particular worry because he chose his options this year, and some of them will depend on the SATS results.

The full article contains 553 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 18 July 2008 11:33 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

werrington lass,

18/07/2008 11:58:54
DISGUSTING...my kids worked hard for their SATS. they got quite worked up about it, and for what? a shambles in marking lets hope the SATS are withdrawn now. i feel they are a total waste ot time and money " £156 million " and they still get it wrong
2

waynesill,

18/07/2008 12:21:57
This is an absolute disgrace and complete waste of money. SATS should be withdrawn with immediate effect and the £156million ploughed back into education where it is so desparately needed.

Yet another hare brained scheme dreamt up by this and other governments.

It is time to sack Ed Balls and all the other incompetents that reside in Whitehall.
3

DonB,

Peterborough 18/07/2008 12:24:56
ETS Europe won a contract in February 2007 to mark school tests for 11 and 14-year-olds.
The company - part of the US testing firm Educational Testing Service - signed a £154 million, five-year contract with the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. In the past, marking was administered by Edexcel, one of England's three main examination boards.

May we assume that Tony Blair is now reaping his reward?
4

initonit,

Peterborough 18/07/2008 12:44:42
I agree that Stats should be withdrawn imediately. Whatever happened to a childhood - kids are constantly tested and assessed, and are therefore not allowed to grow and mature naturally. But the fact they're dragged into this political mess makes the whole thing even worse. Too many institutions don't realise, or care, the effect their actions have on people's futures. People need to be brought to account for this - sorry isn't good enough.
5

initonit,

Peterborough 18/07/2008 12:45:40
I mean SATS of course!
6

woodcote,

werrington 18/07/2008 13:02:55
There is no point in having SATs anyway. They have been stopped for KS1 and both Scotland and Wales don't have them
Students don't need this pressure on them and such an educational system gives all sorts of problems with young people after they leave
Why have the SATs marked externally? RE, History and Georgraphy have SATs but they are marked by the school. Guess what-they are generally identical to the externally marked ones
7

Jimbo1,

Northborough. 18/07/2008 13:32:29
Yet another mess this government have made. Everything they have touched they have messed up.Perhaps we need another review on this.
8

Robert De Niro,

18/07/2008 19:55:02
DISGRACE
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.