Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Peterborough City Council website

New plans to fence off Gunthorpe school fields

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 November 2009
A Gunthorpe school headteacher is making a renewed bid to get the go ahead for plans to put up fences around school fields.
Residents who had used the fields around Norwood Primary School in Gunthorpe, Peterborough, for more than 20 years, won their fight to prevent the two-metre high wooden fences from being put around the school fields after Peterborough City Council's planning committee rejected the plans in September.

But headteacher Deborah Reynolds has now sent letters out to parents urging them to attend a meeting next month about new proposals for the fence.

She said the lack of a secure perimeter fence brought "major safeguarding issues for the school" and would be highlighted in any future Ofsted inspection.

In her letter, Ms Reynolds said: "At this meeting, Norwood Primary School and the city council will be able to present their proposals for a fence around the playing field.

"We want to work with parents and other members of the local community to agree on the best possible design and location for the fence to benefit all concerned, while ensuring that your children are safe while in our care.

"Norwood Primary is unique in Peterborough in not having a fence around its playing field.

She added: "This is an important issue we need to address."

A date for the meeting has still to be fixed.

But ward Cllr Darren Fower said the fence would cut the school off from the community.

He said: "We want to make sure we don't lose what the school was originally built for, which was as a part of the community.

"We want children to be safe, but this feels like scare-mongering."

Elter Walk resident John Streeter said putting a fence up around the field would force children to go elsewhere or cause trouble.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 November 2009 4:00 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

James_Werrington,

Peterborough 27/11/2009 16:21:40
Maybe they want somewhere for the school kids to play that's not covered in dog mess!
Or full of dogs running about for that matter...
2

DonB,

Peterborough 27/11/2009 16:39:07
I don't think so...it is the classic feminist view...all men are voyeuristic and potential paedophiles.
Never mind Grandad waving to his grand children.
3

In the round,

Werrington. 27/11/2009 17:36:07
It's not "unique" when Ken Stimpson does not have its field fenced off.
4

jessica wendy,

peterborough 27/11/2009 17:59:14
They don't want to put up a 'two-metre high wooden fence'. They want a fence like other Primary schools in the area. The children are unable to use the field because of the dog mess, broken glass and other problems. The excuse of "but where will the children go now" is rubbish, Cambel drive field is 2 minutes walk up Elter walk for the community to use.
5

Tiny bit of common sense,

Gunthorpe 27/11/2009 20:05:13
I suppose it would be too much to ask to expect anyone from the ET to approach the school and get an official comment on how in this day and age unfortunately keeping their pupils safe is so high on the agenda - no one minds Grandad waving at the kids...its the people walking through the middle of playtime and PE lessons - and the horses, dog mess, broken glass and even worse types of litter they are more worried about. I'd like to know my children were safe when I left them at school for the day.
Ken Stimpson definitely has safe PE areas for lessons.
6

Yanni,

27/11/2009 20:08:54
Jessica is spot on. The 'community' does use the area to walk their dogs and a good majority don't clean up after them, even on the school playing ground..
7

DonB,

Peterborough 27/11/2009 21:53:09
I despair at some of you. Why a six foot high wooden fence when a chain link would serve the same purpose?
The wooden fence is to shut off the children from the outside world and the underlying motive is feminism.
8

Sofedup,

27/11/2009 22:11:52
DonB why do you think feminism = anti male? This has nothing to do with feminism - this is about a fence that stops the community from using the open space. 20/30 years ago there were few schools with great big fences round them - and they were inclusive and open and looked nice and welcoming - the problem with fences is they create barroers both ways. Wouldn't it be better if the school identified the risks they were concerned about and found ways to mitigate that risk - rather than going for the easy fencing option?
9

Alan Yaxley,

Lost 27/11/2009 22:13:30
No, you all got it wrong, its to keep the brats in and protect the local residents !
10

SLB,

27/11/2009 23:32:37
Clearly "In the round" has overlooked the fact that Ken Stimpson is a secondary school. Don B...get a grip, no-one is being feminist,the fence proposed is NOT, repeat NOT, wooden, there is a time and place to wave to grandchildren and encouraging them whilst they are doing pe or playing at lunchtime is not the time or the place.If your grandchildren were put off their lessons by someone elses grandparent I'm sure you wouldn't be happy then. I work at a different peterborough school, we are completely fenced in, however the fence is obviously see through. People can't just walk in or dogs get in etc etc, BUT we would not welcome grandparents, or anyone, standing waving at their kids in lessons or breaktimes.The best poit is made by "Tiny bit of common sense". If the ET did their research instead of listening to councillors with nothing but gaining votes on their agenda, they would know that schools have to prove to Ofsted they can safeguard their pupils.Oh...and just to disprove your point Don...I am male!
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.