Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

New crackdown starts on seatbelt risk-takers



View Video
Download Video

Video

PC Tony Barrios explains the idea behind today's seatbelt crackdown
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 September 2008
POLICE in Peterborough today launched a fresh crackdown on drivers and passengers who don't belt up.
Those who fail to wear a seatbelt while travelling on Cambridgeshire's roads are being targeted by officers as part of a week-long enforcement blitz which got under way today.

The initiative is part of a European-wide campaign organised by Traffic Information System Police (TISPOL) and is backed by photographic evidence gathered by Evening Telegraph photographers showing one driver every two minutes flouting the law in the city centre.

Police conducted spot checks in Thorpe Road, Peterborough, at 8am today and dished out fines to anyone caught not buckling up.

Casualty reduction officer Pc Tony Barrios said: "A seatbelt can mean the difference between life and death and it astonishes me that some people continue to risk their lives by not belting up.


    How the rules have been updated
  • 1983: The law on wearing seatbelts in the front of vehicles came into force.

  • 1989: Regulations came into effect for mandatory rear seatbelt wearing by children.

  • 1991: Wearing a seat belt in the back of a car became compulsory.

  • 2006: It became compulsory for drivers to ensure that children up to 135cm (4ft 5ins) tall use the correct child car seats or boosters in cars, vans and goods vehicles.

  • There are very few exceptions to these rules.


"Putting on your seatbelt should be part of your routine before even starting your car, and drivers should be responsible for ensuring all passengers wear their seatbelts."

Last year, 4,337 people were issued with £30 Fixed Penalty Notices (FPN) for failing to wear a seatbelt in the county.

Pc Barrios added: "Last year saw the number of fatal collisions at its highest for seven years, and we are determined to reduce this.

"Part of this work is to ensure the laws of the roads are adhered to and those who continue to ignore the law are targeted.

"Over the next, week officers will be conducting road checks in a bid to crack down on those failing to wear a seatbelt while travelling on the county's roads."

Shocking statistics show that one in 10 drivers and front-seat passengers, and four in 10 rear-seat adults still don't wear seatbelts, and many drivers still fail to ensure that children are properly secured.

Seatbelt wearing in the front seat is thought to save more than 2,200 lives every year.

Everyone knows they should wear a seatbelt in the front, but many people still don't realise how dangerous it is not to wear a seat belt in the back of a vehicle.

In a crash at 30mph, if you are unrestrained, you will hit the front seat, and anyone in it, with a force of between 30 and 60 times your own body weight.

In January, it was revealed that 2.3 million drivers were still not buckling up, a quarter of a century after the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) successfully campaigned for compulsory belt-wearing to save lives.

And an ET investigation captured one driver every two minutes flouting the law.

The full article contains 525 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 September 2008 10:54 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

nnooop,

dogsthorpe 08/09/2008 12:29:57
Great - more officers available to stand on street corners waiting to hastle the motorist - it would be better to use these officers to sort out anti social behaviour, drug dealinf and arson which are rife in this city. This is just misappropriation of police time
2

City Centre,

08/09/2008 12:38:28
nnoop- i agree with you. i think there are too many crackdowns on motorists, and not enough policing of more important issues and crime. i see the crackdown as a tax levy for the county police officers. But on the other hand, not enough people wear their belts including parents not putting belts on their children. A £30 fine is a joke and not really enough of an incentive for people to obey the law.
3

,

08/09/2008 14:20:42
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
4

,

08/09/2008 14:23:01
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
5

Bodie,

08/09/2008 14:25:38
If drivers were more responsible there would not be any need for these crackdowns. Even making the penalty for driving whilst using a mobile 'phone, without a hands free system, endorsable hasn't discouraged drivers from doing it. The standards of driving in this country is deplorable. We could learn a lot from the Scandinavians when it comes to driving. On our frequent visits to Sweden it is evident that they treat the motoring laws with a great deal more respect than we do and there is less offending for drink driving and speeding there and less carnage on their roads.
6

Bodie,

08/09/2008 14:43:47
looks like the phantom deleter is at it again. There wasn't anything wrong with the comment somebody put on 4 above but someone has deleted it.
7

dungeon68,

08/09/2008 15:13:38
i agree bodie,if drivers didnt break the law,the police wouldnt have to'misapropriate'there time,we should have tougher laws,6 points and a hefty fine,for both non seat belt wearers and mobile phone users.the roads are dangerous enough without these plonkers on them
8

Lazy Daisy,

08/09/2008 16:00:14
Remember that it is the Police and Fire Service who have to clear up when a beltless cretin has smashed his (or her) brainless head on the windscreen. Also they do not like scraping up the innocent children travelling with these idiots. Re the misappropriation claim, it is a known fact that people who commit "petty" crimes like this are often breaking the law in other ways too. An officer who stops a car will notice the smell of alcohol or drugs and have a quick glance at things like tyre condition. An experienced officer will be suspicious if a driver behaves in a certain way and make further checks.
9

Jeffrey Jones,

08/09/2008 17:47:01
Lets us be proud of our boys in blue you can go shoplifting and get a caution you can be abusive in public places and told to behave, but if you dont wear a seat belt you'll get a £30.00 fine. why not put stocks up in cathedral square or introduce public floggings to entertain the shoppers on a saturday, for those naughty motorist who dont put their seat belt on.it's about time the police spent time on crime and stop going for soft options to make their figures look good on paper.
10

Joff,

Peterborough 08/09/2008 17:53:07
Failure to wear a seatbelt only affects the occupants of the vehicle, yet other commonplace motoring offences such as speeding and using a mobile phone can affect other road users.

I'd rather the Police used these resources to catch motorists speeding through rat runs through residential areas.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.