Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

MPs fail to get their way in abortion vote



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 May 2008
THE city's MPs have declared their disappointment after the House of Commons voted to retain the status quo on abortion limits.
In the first major re-examination of the law for nearly two decades, the maximum time span for terminations was kept at 24 weeks, despite claims that scientific progress now means some babies can survive outside the womb before then.

MP for Peterb
orough, Stewart Jackson, said he was disappointed a move to cut the limit to 20 weeks had been rejected and said the outcome did not reflect prevailing views outside the House.

He said: "I am very disappointed that Parliament did not accurately reflect public opinion, but I think a moral victory has been achieved in that this issue has been properly debated for the first time in years.

"I voted for reductions to 16 and 20 weeks and I was on the losing side, but I was reflecting the views of the majority and of the many people who have contacted me."

MP for North West Cambs, Shailesh Vara, voted for a reduction to 20 weeks as his first preference, but backed 22 when that was defeated.

He said: "The scientific evidence provides arguments for both sides, but I think a small reduction would probably have been the right way to go.

"There is some evidence now that scientific progress has overtaken the time limit and, given that the debate is unlikely to appear again until many years into the future when science will have moved on again, there's an argument for a reduction."

Last night's votes followed long and impassioned debates in the Commons on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill.

The Government insisted there was no evidence requiring the current abortion laws to be changed, with Health Minister Dawn Primarolo claiming science had not changed the situation since the 24-week limit was set.

She said: "The upper gestational limit for termination of pregnancy was set by Parliament in 1990 at 24 weeks because the scientific evidence of the time was that the 'threshold of viability' had increased and babies were increasingly surviving at 24 weeks and above.

"That was the case in 1990 and it's certainly the case now."

But Conservative MP for Mid Bedfordshire Nadine Dorries proposed a new 20-week limit, claiming, "There comes a point when it has to be said this baby has a right to life."

Her plan was defeated by 332 votes to 190. A move to bring in a 22-week maximum was thrown out by 304 votes to 233.

Mr Jackson said he looked forward to the issue being looked at again by a new Parliament after the next general election.



The full article contains 454 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 May 2008 12:20 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

reded,

21/05/2008 13:20:49
£5000 donated to S Jackson from Nadine Dorries and her husband. See MP register of donations.
2

James_Werrington,

Peterborough 21/05/2008 13:38:34
Theres a far bigger issue than the time limit here, doctors aren't applying the law properly in 99% of cases. They're basically giving abortions to anyone who wants one which is not what the law intends. As another site says doctors "will refer any woman who requests an abortion, on the grounds that her mental health will suffer by being forced to continue with a pregnancy which is unwanted." If anyone who asked for one was supposed to get one then the whole part of the physical/mental health would not have been put in the law in the first place. The law needs to be clear, you can't just have doctors thinking they know best and doing what they like...
3

captainsawdust,

21/05/2008 14:25:35
Reded read this link http://www.stewartjackson.org.uk/residents.html

stewart jackson with the trotters and the other well know figure that is now back on the council talk about the trotters running the council !! ;-)
4

jammond,

21/05/2008 18:01:15
I would love it if the government passed a law forcing men to have something done to their bodies that would last a lifetime, without their consent. I would sit back, listen to them moan and laugh in their faces.
5

Rati0cinator,

Werrington 21/05/2008 18:08:20
www.vhemt.org
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.