Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Peterborough City Council website

MP plans to publish all future expenses online

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
19 June 2009
Details of MPs' expenses have finally been published online for the public to view – but crucial information which has caused a national outcry has been blacked out.
The House of Commons on Thursday, 18th June released tens of thousands of claim forms and receipts after weeks of controversy sparked after the details were leaked to a national newspaper.

Dozens of MPs across the country have been named and shamed for making excessive claims for household items and payments for mortgages which had already been paid off.

Our own MPs have not been immune from criticism, with the city's Conservative MP Stewart Jackson named for claiming more than £300 to service his swimming pool at his second home in Broadway, Peterborough. The money has now been paid back.

Shailesh Vara, the Tory MP for North West Cambridgeshire, which includes the Stanground, Fletton, Woodston, Hampton and Orton areas of the city, was also named by The Daily Telegraph in connection with the expenses controversy. He denies any wrongdoing.

See your MP's expenses
Full details of expense claims made by Mr Jackson and Mr Vara and other local MPs in the Greater Peterborough area, can be viewed via www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/mpsexpenses.
--------------------

But anyone hoping to view the full details of any claims for themselves today faces a significant stumbling block, with House of Commons censors blacking out a large amount of information.

Addresses for MPs' second homes are hidden, making it impossible to identify so-called "flipping", where MPs switch the designation of their second homes to maximise their claims.

Also covered up are the names and details of people and companies who received payments from expense claims, as well as letters exchanged between MPs and the Commons Fees Office.

What the Parliamentary records do show, however, are details of how much was claimed by MPs between 2005 and 2008, as well as how the money was spent.

In the financial year to April 2008, Mr Jackson claimed a second home allowance of £22,000 out of total expenses of £137,000.

One of his most recent published claims was in December 2007, when he claimed £2,593 for his second home in Peterborough, including £1,509 on mortgage payments, £515 on bills and council tax and £569 on cleaning, maintenance and repairs.

Mr Jackson told The Evening Telegraph he planned to publish all his future claims online.

He said: "I believe that it is right that details of MPs' expenses have now been published.

"As (Conservative leader) David Cameron has said, the expenses needed reforming as, in hindsight, the rules were too lax and were not seen as reasonable.

"I look forward to working within a system which is fair, transparent and does not preclude people from modest backgrounds serving in Parliament, but is acceptable to the general public."

Mr Vara claimed a second home allowance of nearly £23,000 in the year to April 2008, out of total expenses of £134,000.

His most recent claim was for £8,210 spent on mortgage payments between April and May 2007.

Mr Vara, whose constituency home is near Sawtry, said he was happy for his constituents to view his expense claims.

He said: "I welcome all our expenses being put online, and I firmly believe that the public have a right to know how their money is being spent."

Mr Vara added that the censoring of certain details of MPs' claims was necessary to protect confidential information, such as bank account details.

Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 19 June 2009 4:49 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Outcast,

...Out there... 19/06/2009 11:56:08
Taking tips from Majec 12 documents ?
2

twink,

19/06/2009 13:02:57
A few things about Stewart Jackson's claims. There was a claim for £8 to pay for a taxi fare to a funeral. There seems to be 2 claims in January for petty cash (no receipts required). He likes pineapple, crisps, red bull, love hearts and tea. There's an astonishing amount spent on office/printing.

Ultimately, it's all rather boring and, although annoying, quite innocent. The petty cash is one area I'd like to see changed. If I claim £240 per month for petty cash (no receipts or proof required) and then use that money to buy food, pay for train tickets, etc. I can then present my receipts and claim it back. It's rather like money laundering for MPs.
3

twink,

19/06/2009 13:08:01
Actually Stewart, in hindsight MPs saw a golden opportunity to claim, claim, claim. In some cases where claims were denied MPs then cried foul until they got most of the money back. No MP should try to act piously after they've been caught out, nor is it the case that we should assume that all claims made were justified, honest or within the 'spirit of the rules'.
4

,

19/06/2009 14:33:31
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
Prev
1
Next

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.