Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Former councillor's tax fraud case is dropped



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 July 2008
A FORMER councillor says he wants Peterborough City Council to "eat humble pie" after an investigation into his alleged tax irregularities was shelved yesterday.
The case had been brought against one-time Orton with Hampton councillor Garry Parker, who was charged with four counts of "evasion of liability by deception", between July 2003 and June 2006.

Mr Parker, who now lives in Helsinki, Finland, said he lived alone at his city home in Beaumont Way, Hampton Hargate, and that his wife was not a permanent resident there, meaning he was entitled to a 25 per cent reduction in his council tax bill.

A long-running investigation, which began in June 2006, examining whether or not visits from Mr Parker's wife Maria, breached the rules ended yesterday when the criminal case against him was dropped at Huntingdon Crown Court.

It came two months after a civil Valuation Tribunal Committee, an independent body that hears appeals against council tax liability, found Mr Parker was entitled to claim the discount.

Speaking after yesterday's decision, Mr Parker said: "I want a full public apology from the city council and will be claiming substantial damages."

Saying that the allegations had caused embarrassment to himself and his family, had left a stain on his character and had damaged his potential earnings, Mr Parker added: "I did a Google search on my name and found I am on a BNP list of dodgy councillors."

Mr Parker, who had to serve the last four months as a councillor on the independent benches, said: "I found myself trying to do my civic duty as a councillor, but that became virtually impossible towards the end.

"By profession, I am a public affairs lobbyist. To do that work, rather like being a journalist, you need to have a good reputation, and the case damaged my reputation."

The council's head of communications, Caroline Parsons, said: "When we referred the case to the police, we had evidence that backed up the allegations.

"We believed there was a case to be heard. The council has a duty to protect taxpayers' money."

The council's director of strategic resources, John Harrison, said: "When we believe that there is a matter that may have resulted in inappropriate use of taxpayers' money, then, in all cases, we refer evidence to police.

"The way we have dealt with former councillor Garry Parker is no different to how we would have dealt with any other case."

in 2006, Mr Parker was twice interviewed under caution, prior to being charged with four counts of "evasion of liability by deception".

Mr Parker, who represented Orton with Hampton between May 2004 and May 2007, had the Conservative whip withdrawn in January 2007, but he was not expelled from the national party.

At the time, former councillor David Thorpe, chairman of the North West Cambridgeshire Conservative Association, had cited Mr Parker living in Finland as the reason.

The full article contains 490 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 July 2008 12:19 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

KiwiinPboro,

24/07/2008 13:00:54
Council and financial irregularities, now there's something you don't see very often!
2

TravDav,

Thorney Heights 24/07/2008 13:34:12
Does 'envelope' and 'pushing come to mind.
3

Chiefy,

Bretton 24/07/2008 16:21:47
The ongoing fiasco regarding alleged PCC councillors' financial credibilty is shamefull. They,like our MPs are in a postion of trust and therefore should double check prior to claiming benficial allowances.
But don't expect anything to change!
4

Hi-Tech,

Here and there 24/07/2008 18:39:45
"We believed there was a case to be heard. The council has a duty to protect taxpayers' money." So why bring a case to court when they had only a slight chance of winning....
5

,

24/07/2008 18:44:30
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
6

Blizzard,

25/07/2008 11:34:36
had mr parker walked away with his reputation restored i would have thought him a decent chap, to now go after financial recompense i consider him a money grabbing so and so. let it drop, and enjoy the scenery in helsinki far away from pottyboro.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.