Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fight over Stanground warehouse plans continues



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 April 2008
Email Jonny Muir
THE battle goes on for campaigning residents after city leaders refused to remove references to a controversial development plan from a high-level council document.
Distribution giant Gazeley wants to put up seven warehouses and a rail freight interchange, known as Magna Park, across 135 hectares of countryside between Park Farm, Stanground and the train tracks of the Felixstowe to Nuneaton line.

A section is dedicated to Magna Park in Peterborough City Council's 160-page draft Core Strategy, a document that will decide where 27,000 homes are built and 20,000 jobs created over the next 18 years.

Although city leaders have stated that the administration is neither for nor against Magna Park, the scheme was included in the Core Strategy because a development of its size and scale could not be ignored.

Yesterday, about 40 Park Farm residents descended on the town hall to urge the council's cabinet members to change their minds.

Residents are convinced that if the city council stands up to the proposal, it would force Gazeley to re-think its interest in developing the land.

Such was the level of public interest, the meeting started five minutes late as the crowd, many wearing T-shirts bearing the slogan "Stand up for Stanground" crammed into the Bourges and Viersen rooms.

In turn, the three Stanground Central councillors – Irene Walsh, Brian Rush and Marco Cereste – called on the administration to delete Magna Park from the Core Strategy.

They challenged Gazeley's assertion that the development would create 5,400 jobs, raised fears that lorries would leave Stanground gridlocked and questioned the wisdom of building on a designated Environment Agency flood plain.

Despite their pleas, cabinet members confirmed that Magna Park would remain in the Core Strategy.

Defending the decision, Cllr Graham Murphy said it would give Park Farm residents two opportunities to raise their concerns – during Core Strategy consultation events in May and if, or when, Gazeley submits a planning application.

Council leader Cllr John Peach said: "We are trying to give you a better say in what should happen in your community."

He said a decision on whether to include Magna Park would then be made following the results of the consultation, before the Core Strategy is submitted for Government approval next year.

Cllr Stephen Goldspink proposed adding a statement to yesterday's cabinet recommendation to show that the strength of public support in the month since residents found out about the Magna Park proposal had been recognised.

It read: "Cabinet is asked to note that references to the Magna Park development in the Core Strategy preferred options document, does not imply any pre-disposition either for or against the outline proposal.

The full article contains 451 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 01 April 2008 11:41 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

,

10/04/2008 23:28:48
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

Chris York,

16/04/2008 07:10:33
The Environmental Action group at www.park-farm.com are the original action group setup, the group have a large committee membership and DO NOT take a hostile approach or act in an illegal manner
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.