Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Evicted mum jailed after hoax bomb is left at house



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 May 2008
A MOTHER of four left a hoax bomb in her house before being evicted after arguments with her neighbours.
Amanda Copley (35) left the aluminium suitcase in her house in Stephenson Close, March, with the words "Tick tock, tick tock, boom!" written on the front.

She also attached wires and a watch to the top of the case, in an attempt to make it look like a time bomb.

When police found the suitcase in June last year, the quiet cul-de-sac had to be evacuated and cordoned off, and the power supply was switched off.

Army bomb disposal experts were called and carried out a controlled explosion, when it was discovered that the case was a hoax.

Peterborough Crown Court was told yesterday Copley had also scrawled graffiti caricatures of her neighbours all over the walls of rooms inside after months of rows.

However, Copley, who now lives in County Durham, denied causing major flood damage to the house, after it was discovered the bath taps had been left on while the bath was full of rubbish.

Mitigating for a heavily pregnant Copley, Charles Faulk said she had a long history of problems with depression and alcoholism, and constant arguments with her neighbours had sent her on a downward spiral, to the point where she was evicted from the home.

Mr Faulk said: "At the time her children were running amok, causing trouble with the neighbours.

"When they heard she was being evicted, all the neighbours were cock-a-hoop and celebrating in her face. She thought her eviction was public entertainment, and she was at her lowest ebb.

"She had been drinking, and wanted to counteract the expected spectacle, so carried out the oafish and stupid plan.

"She did not want to cause major disruption, and is genuinely ashamed of her actions."

Sentencing Copley, who pleaded guilty to criminal damage and having an article with intent at a previous hearing, Judge Nicholas Coleman said: "It is suggested that this was a drunken and oafish act – but I think there was more thought than that. I have no doubt that a great deal of panic was caused by your stupidity."

Copley was sentenced to two months for criminal damage, and 10 months for the bomb hoax, to be served concurrently.

She was also given a one-month jail term for breaking a suspended sentence order, which will be served consecutively to the other term.

The full article contains 416 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 May 2008 11:34 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

,

13/05/2008 14:00:05
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

Claire40,

13/05/2008 14:15:01
For once, Old Peterborezz, I totally agree with you! Bet your comment gets removed though.
3

scuzz,

Peterborough 13/05/2008 14:45:40
What a fine example to her children this "woman" is. She should have been locked up for longer. She should foot the bill for the trouble she caused.
4

Rustrobson,

13/05/2008 15:05:28
i totally agree with you all, but she will be kept in jail (if thats what you can call it) at the tax payers expense ,then on release given another house to reek havoc again,this will of cause be paid for by housing benefit,bring back hard labour for the likes of her,i bet she has never done a days work in her life.
5

,

13/05/2008 15:29:38
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
6

scuzz,

Peterborough 13/05/2008 15:43:49
Dan10188 are you for real? She faked a bomb! In this day in age your saying thats ok? You need to think before you type.
7

Claire40,

13/05/2008 15:46:36
That's all very well scuzz, but in order to 'think' he'd need a brain.
8

Dan Jackson,

13/05/2008 15:51:37
This is a pathetic sentence. When will judges give decent sentences for these types of crimes. She should have got at least 5 years.
9

,

13/05/2008 16:05:36
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
10

Dan Jackson,

13/05/2008 16:17:53
I reckon dan 10188 shows his maturity as a 20 year old. Are you one of her kids maybe or one of the other chavs who makes peoples life hell like she did hence the eviction?

Maybe we can all go round bomb hoaxing dan 10188 - could be the new chav sport.
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.