Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

ET takes Post Office protest to Downing Street



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 August 2008
Stephen Briggs
CUSTOMERS have been backing the rallying call to keep Post Office branches open, in large numbers.
The Hands off our Post Offices campaign, launched by The Evening Telegraph, has already attracted close to 2,000 signatures.

The petition was launched in March this year when the Post Office announced that there would be a large number of closures.

North West Cambridgeshire MP Shailesh Vara will be presenting the ET petition to Downing Street at noon on Thursday (August 14).

He will be accompanied by city MP Stewart Jackson, leader of Peterborough City Council John Peach and ET Editor Mark Edwards.
The hit list of the 23 branches in Cambridgeshire was announced on July 8.

They included Ramsey St Mary's, Great Gidding, Holme and St Peter's Road, March, in Cambridgeshire and West Town, New England and Woodston in Peterborough.

The Post Office also announced a seven-week consultation exercise before a final decision is made on which branches will close.

There has been widespread opposition to the closures.

Special Report: Hands Off Our Post Offices
The ET launched its campaign in April 2008 as news of proposed closures across the region was confirmed.
---------------------------

Public meetings organised by Mr Vara and Mr Jackson saw more than 150 residents attend each one to voice their concerns about the
distance and difficulty of getting to other branches.

But the Post Office says the cost-cutting exercise is needed to ensure their business remains viable.

Mr Vara said the large number of signatures that The ET campaign had attracted was a huge demonstration by the local community of their support of their post offices.

He added: "They are a vital resource for everyone, particularly the elderly and disabled.

"I very much hope that even at this stage the Government will take note of the massive support from people.

"It's the Government's decision to close post offices and they have the power to keep them open."

Mr Jackson, too, believes there is overwhelming support to keep the branches open.

He said: "I think there is a groundswell of feeling against the closure proposals. I hope the Post Office will take note and read all the e-mails and letters and think about rescinding their decision."


The full article contains 377 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 August 2008 1:36 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

A Seymour,

12/08/2008 13:14:39
Good to see the local paper getting involved for once instead of just standing back and letting it happen. Post Offices are at the heart of the rural community and should not be closed. The reason some do less trade now is because the Government has taken the business away.
2

Steeler,

12/08/2008 16:11:00
I hope that either the ET or Cllr peach himself are paying for his trip.
Whilst on the trip the editor might like to ask Cllr Peach why he is so interested in the PO issue. The editor could start by asking why PCC did not make a submission when the PO first asked for comments from interested parties on its plans originally. Others Local Authorities did but PCC appeared to deem it not necessary - it does not appear in the list of respondents.
If he couldn't do his job then, why should the council tax payers of Peacherborough have to pay for his publicity trip now?
3

Tarnshark,

12/08/2008 17:15:04
Why we need post offices is beyond me - you can do everything you can do in a post office easier and quicker on the net.

Apart from send a parcels - I suppose we need them for that
4

nkmabm,

The Real World 12/08/2008 21:20:00
Could it be the Conservative council and Conservative MPs are only up in arms about this because it was proposed by a Labour government?
What would have happened if the same civil servants that proposed all this had done it while there was a Conservative government?
Then the Conservatives would have thought it was the greatest thing since sliced bread and it would be down to the Labour politicians to say it was a stupid idea and for them to take the protest to Downing Street.
5

Paul33,

13/08/2008 07:32:35
As a regular user of "local" post-offices, I see a significant difference between the "safe" and the "at-risk" offices. Most of the latter are old-fashioned locations who appear to offer little beyond a very dated service and are rarely used as a result.

Reality is that many tradional PO services can now be obtained quicker and more simply elsewhere and that isn't going to change. Post Offices need to recognise that they have no given right to exist any more than any other failing business has.

The service to the community argument is a flawed one as the label is usually applied to offices that really offer little more than an excuse for a natter and a routine for Aunt Nellie and her dog. It is down to the Post Offices "at risk" to diversify and offer a genuine broader range of services and if they do that - as many do - then they have nothing to fear.

It is sad to see them go but unless the general public are prepared to pay for those that are failing businesses then we have to move on - the times they are a changing !
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.