Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Peterborough City Council website

Dogs left to suffer in squalid conditions

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 April 2008
Asha Mehta
SEVEN greyhounds suffered for up to two months in "squalid conditions" without access to food and water.
The emaciated racing dogs were found by horrified RSPCA officers when they swooped on the home of mother and daughter Rose and Rebecca Hagger.

After seeing photographs of the animals – some of whom also had pressure sores and were kept in kennels with a build up of dog mess – Peterborough magistrates banned owner Rebecca (20) from keeping animals for 10 years.

Her mother Rose (51) was disqualified from keeping dogs for 10 years.

The court was told how on September 6 last year, RSPCA inspector Kat Parfitt arrived at Red Brick Farm, Edgerly Drain Road, Fengate.

There, she found greyhounds Itchy, Ted, Tommy, George, Jack, Dixie and Jenny in the kennels, with just small scraps of paper for bedding.

They were also flea-ridden and up to six kilos underweight.

But it was the "overpowering stench" of urine and dog mess which first hit them.

Prosecuting, Robert Starr said: "They were in squalid conditions.

"Small amounts of shredded paper were being used for bedding, which was insufficient to provide comfort and there was no food or water available.

"A number of dogs had visible pressure sores and lesions all over their body and appeared emaciated."

Six dogs were taken into the care of the RSPCA and Jack was seized by police, although the pair retained ownership of him.

The pair pleaded guilty to seven counts of animal cruelty, including causing unnecessary suffering and failing to ensure the dogs' needs were met.

In mitigation, the court heard Rebecca had just had a baby and was thrown out of the family home by her father, who owned the dogs jointly with her.

He subsequently died.

She had been treating the animals with flea powder, but when it didn't work, she admitted not going to seek advice from the vet.

Her mother, who didn't own or have specialist knowledge of caring for the animals, tried to care for them after her husband's death, but couldn't cope.

Defending Rose Hagger, Jason Stevens said: "Her husband died and her daughter had a child. It was very difficult in that time and the dogs ended up in the state they were in."

Addressing Rebecca, chairman of the bench Mary Morrell said: "We have seen some really appalling photos.

"You were well aware of how greyhounds should be kept. There was no access to water, which is fundamental to any animal."

She told Rose and she was negligent rather than intentionally cruel.

Rebecca Hagger was given 200 hours unpaid community work.

Rose Hagger was handed a 12-month conditional discharge.

Both women were ordered to pay £250 costs each.

The court ordered Jack to be taken away by the RSPCA.

If you could give one of these greyhounds a loving home, call 01733 248116.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 April 2008 11:52 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

futuristic,

29/04/2008 12:23:12
you notice straight away she (rose) didnt go without.
her & her daughter should have been jailed straight away for at least 5 yrs.

really horrible people.
2

Paul33,

Peterborough 29/04/2008 12:30:01
How can she turn up to court with dogs all over her clothing after doing that ?!!!
3

moaningminnie,

29/04/2008 13:03:41
If vets weren't such money grabbers poor people might take their animals to them sooner
4

EmmaB,

29/04/2008 13:23:51
Of course vets overcharge, however this is no excuse to let an animal suffer.
5

nnooop,

Dogsthorpe 29/04/2008 13:34:04
Note that the article publishes their address - let's hope that they get no peace....
6

The Lamb Family - ,

29/04/2008 15:08:03
Sorry if they cant afford vet treatment for one animal why have 7. Its disgusting and only banned for 10 years for the mother. She should be banned for life also they should stick her in a cell to rot with only a thin sheet of paper for her bed then she will know what it feels like!
7

,

29/04/2008 19:08:23
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
8

K Cox,

30/04/2008 09:00:54
You can't blame the cost of vets bills for people allowing their dogs to suffer. Vets have to makes a living and their is no NHS for animals so the rule should be if you can't afford the upkeep then blimin well don't get a pet. You wouldn't get a car that you couldn't afford to run would you? If you can't look after them then rehome or even better don't get one in the first place
9

greyhoundlady,

Wethersfield, CT USA 09/05/2008 19:49:32
I am truly amazed that people like this can sleep at night. And shame on that judge, these people should be banned for LIFE from owning any animals. Not to mention a fine that would hurt them so that maybe they could only afford paper for bedding and no food or water for at least two months. Are there people who actually still believe it is okay to let animals suffer? Do they forget that we are also of the animal kingdom and have the same senses and feelings? I'd watch that baby closely also, as there is a proven corelation between animal abusers and child abusers.
10

Bryan Leach,

Harlow, Essex 10/05/2008 06:07:25
It's people like this, who in my opinion, should be dragged out into the centre of Peterborough and flogged. I would in fact volunteer. When I look over my shoulder at my three old greyhounds stretched out on the couch's who are now safe, I can't but shed a tear for all those other poor abused greyhounds wherever they may be, who are suffering at the hands of people like this. Greyhounds certainly don't deserve a life of abuse.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.