Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Closing time for pub after under-age drink rap



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 July 2008
A CITY pub has been ordered to shut up shop for three months after a member of staff sold alcopops to under-18s.
A barman at Bogarts, in North Street, was caught selling bottles of WKD during a test purchase carried out by the Peterborough Evening Partnership on March 7.

Despite telling a Peterborough City Council licensing sub-committee on Wednesday that the oversight was a "genuine mistake", Carl Melillo was told that Bogarts would be stripped of its premises licence.

The licence will be suspended for three months, or until Cambridgeshire police, which triggered the review of the licence, is satisfied that comprehensive training on under-age sales has been given to staff.

Mr Melillo was also told that upon re-opening, he must ensure that a personal licence holder is on the premises at all times when alcohol is for sale.

Defending the barman, Mr Melillo said: "The chap who did the serving made a genuine mistake. I have at all times insisted that they must ask for ID if there is any doubt about age. At Christmas 2007, we passed a similar check by the authority with flying colours.

"This was a genuine mistake and the barman is sorry. All I can do is apologise on his behalf."

The latest decision is a further blow for Bogarts, coming a month after a bid to demolish the business and turn it into apartments was turned down.

Mr Melillo said Bogarts was already closed because of the economic "times we are in at the moment".

In response to a question from committee member councillor Charles Swift about whether or not there were plans to re-open Bogarts, Mr Melillo said: "It is very difficult to keep the business running.

"I cannot say how long it will be closed, but, hopefully, not for too long."

Mr Melillo added that he was looking at options to rent the building, or put it up for sale.

Although it is not listed, Bogarts – which dates back to 1837 – was saved from demolition after members of the city council's planning and environmental protection committee said the building should be preserved.

After 40 minutes of deliberation, committee chairman Cllr Yvonne Lowndes said a three-month ban on trading would be enforced, as recommended by Cambridgeshire police.

When asked for his reaction to the ruling, Mr Melillo declined to comment.

The council's licensing enforcement officer Darren Dolby said: "We hope that the suspension will remind all retailers of alcohol in Peterborough of the need to ensure that they put in place an adequate level of staff training to prevent any sales of alcohol to people under the age of 18, and the potential consequences if they do not."

The full article contains 461 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 July 2008 7:41 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

TMitC,

04/07/2008 07:47:53
That's a bit harsh. I've never heard of such a punishment for one minor incident. Sounds right fishy to me, just days after it was reopened.
2

motr,

Dogsthorpe 04/07/2008 08:51:31
Hmmm...
3

WE ALL LOVE DREAD,

04/07/2008 08:55:02
we here have a corrupt council being a law to themselves ..
4

GJH,

04/07/2008 09:20:29
Can the ET please get their facts and landlord comments up to date please. "I cannot say how long it will be closed, but, hopefully, not for too long.", and 'Mr Melillo added that he was looking at options to rent the building, or put it up for sale.'

Bogarts has been open for business under its new management for the past two weeks. I'm just hoping this closure doesn't force the new tenant away, as Dennis is doing a grand job.
5

Yet another fed up,

Peterborough 04/07/2008 10:26:48
Can't help feeling there's more to this than meets the eye..the owners not wanting it open as a pub!
It's going to be a case of watch the story unfold.
6

Dan Jackson,

04/07/2008 10:43:15
Maybe the ET would like to take on the bigger establishments rather than picking on Bogart's all the time. Why don't you go to the ones in Broadway or a certain supermarket in Rivergate, all of whom reguarly sell to underage.

Amazingly though the ET are never interested in the big players.
7

A higher presence,

04/07/2008 11:02:00
Dan, it wasn't the ET which carried out the test purchase, it was the police / council. Why don't you try reading the article?
8

Frustrated Journalist,

Peterborough 04/07/2008 11:31:55
So, let me get this right.

Owner's adjoining premises closed by authorities because of fire safety issues.
Council reject planning application by the owner.
Council remove the license for Bogarts because they are caught selling alcohol to someone underage (tell me a city centre venue that doesn't).

Has the owner done something to upset someone on the council?
9

KiwiinPboro,

04/07/2008 11:51:56
Yeah they probably don't have a criminal record so can't join the council network
10

Dan Jackson,

04/07/2008 11:58:00
A higher presence - why don't you try reading my comment instead of being pedantic. I said why don't the ET pick on someone else. They always print bad press on Bogart's and do nothing to the others.

Anything else you want to be pedantic on or does this meet with your satisfaction and approval?
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.