Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Car 'too powerful' for crash driver to control



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 September 2008
A DRIVER who crashed a high-powered BMW which had bald tyres has admitted he could not control the power the car had.
Stewart Urqhart (26), of Pingle Bank, Holme, near Peterborough, crashed a BMW M3 on Lincoln Road, Walton, Peterborough in May this year.

Peterborough Magistrates' Court heard that Urqhart had picked the car up for his boss, but lost control on the wet road on a roundabout near a petrol station on the road.

The collision happened just yards away from a crossing point used by dozens of children attending the nearby Voyager School.

A police inspection of the car after the crash showed that two of the tyres were bald.

Yesterday Urqhart pleaded guilty to driving without due care and attention and two counts of driving a vehicle with defective tyres.

Prosecuting, Giles Beaumont said: "On Friday, May 16 he was driving along the Lincoln Road near the Shell garage. When he got on to the roundabout, he lost traction and hit the central reservation.

"After the accident police described the tyres on the car as being 'bald.'

"When he was interviewed by police he said that he had 'given it some gas' and lost control."

Urqhart, who appeared at court without a solicitor, said: "I had picked up the car for my boss. I understand that it is ultimately my responsibility to make sure the car was road worthy, but my boss said it would be fine to drive.

"I was driving down the road, when I put my foot down and lost control. I remember the steering wheel shaking, and the next thing I knew the emergency services had arrived.

"I am not making any excuses, and found the car was just too much for me to handle.

"I was travelling at less than 40 mph when I crashed."

Chair of the magistrates Lionel Cunnington agreed with Urqhart that it was the drivers responsibility to check that the car was road worthy, and that he should have checked before getting in the car.

Urqhart was fined £160 for the driving without due care and attention, and £80 for each count of driving with defective tyres.

He was also ordered to pay £35 costs and a victim surcharge of £15, as well as having six points put on his licence.

The full article contains 393 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 September 2008 10:57 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

A Seymour,

06/09/2008 13:59:36
3 points for each tyre I assume but no points for careless driving? There appears to be a lack on consistancy on penalties handed out by courts.
2

WE ALL LOVE DREAD,

06/09/2008 17:14:17
A Seymour agreed..
3

anon1,

Crowland 07/09/2008 01:09:34
What is it with the car is to powerful for me excuse; that's twice is as many weeks we've heard that, although at least this guy had the guts to admit it in court. I don't understand how a car can be to poweful for any given individual. The art of driving is the same no matter what the car is, and it only goes as fast as the driver makes it. I've driven cars from an 850 mini to a 6 litre rolls and have not lost conrol of any of them, and if I can do it then so should every one else who has a driving license.
4

,

07/09/2008 09:53:08
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
5

anon1,

Crowland 07/09/2008 12:57:54
Blizzard. there is still no excuse for crashing a car due to it's power. It's a poor mitigation to use in court which should never be allowed. This guy crashed near a school. What would have happened if the kids were just leaving school and he ploughed into a group of them? Thankfully that didn't happen, but the potential is there. More to the point, he states that he was doing no more than 40 mph; the speed limit along there is 30 mph anyway, and if he can't control a car at 40 mph. then he should not be on the road. I will never except not used to the power, the car, etc as an excuse for a crash. Drive to your limits, familiarise youtself with the vehicle and the controls, and drive within the road and condition limits and you will not cause a crash. It's not rocket science, just common sense.
6

Blizzard,

07/09/2008 17:30:38
i don't see your point anon. the guy confessed to losing control after in his words 'giving it some gas'. in otherwords the car(s) he normally drives don't accelerate that quickly. consider a wet road and bald tyres contributing to his spinning out. he adds 'the car was too much for me to handle' that's an honest account not an excuse. yes common sense says drive to your limits, in court he owned up not to doing so. so no excuse at all.
7

villa23285,

Walton 08/09/2008 08:04:56
speed limit is 40mph along that stretch of road
8

Bodie,

08/09/2008 11:53:05
Bald tyres on a wet road are a lethal combination, full stop. He was, effectively, in a lethal weapon. Even a vehicle which is not "high powered" is lethal in such a state, in such conditions and it doesn't even need to be doing 40mph to kill.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.