Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Arsonists start four fires as house burns



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 October 2008
Asha Mehta
POLICE are searching for arsonists who torched a Peterborough house this morning (14 October) putting neighbours' lives at risk.
Fire chiefs say four separate rooms were set alight by the arsonists, causing widespread damage to the house in Harris Street. Millfield, Peterborough.

A search of the building was launched by fire crews, who arrived at the scene at about 4.30am, and believed people were trapped inside.

They carried out a thorough search of the property and broke down the door of the adjacent house as smoke had spread through the roof space.

No one was inside either of the buildings, but firefighters said arsonists had still put lives in danger.

Watch manager at Dogsthorpe fire station Steve Duffy, who, along with firefighters from Stanground and Peterborough Volunteers, tackled the blaze, said: "There wasn't anyone in at the time, but it was reported that there was.

"If we believe there are people in the property, we make every effort to rescue them.

"We deployed breathing apparatus into the building in order to carry out a thorough search of each room as quickly as possible.

"It was deliberate and multi-sited, which means there were four separate fires in four different rooms. Furniture was set alight.

"Clearly, this is a deliberate act and has certainly put lives at risk.

"The property was an end terrace. There is a row of five houses, the majority of which have a common roof space.

"When fire gets into the roof, which it did in this case, it travels along and begins to affect other properties, where people are asleep.

"But because of the offensive tactics we employed, we managed to stop fire in the original property.

"Smoke did affect other properties."

He added: "Had we not acted as we did, the fire would certainly have spread, and considering the time of night the fire occurred, lives would have been put at risk."

The fire was under control by just before 6am.

There was extensive smoke and fire damage to both the first and ground floors.

Investigators from the fire service and police were at the scene this morning combing the scene for clues.

If you have any information, call police on 0845 456 4564, or Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555111.


A 23-year-old man and a 22-year-old woman from Peterborough have been arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, and are currently in custody at Thorpe Wood police station.

The full article contains 414 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 October 2008 11:35 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Jimbo1,

14/10/2008 13:12:32
Criminal damage , that should be attempted murder. Morons who do this should be locked away for a long time.
2

Bodie,

14/10/2008 13:21:12
Many lives could have been lost because of these idiots. Lock them up and throw away the key !
3

TravDav,

Thorney Heights 14/10/2008 14:53:50
I assume that if the culprits are ever found there will be the usual tap on their wrist. If they are juvenile then their names will not be published for legal reasons. This is an out of date concept from a time when there was more respect for the law and other people. Now some of these youngsters are absolutely evil and I think their names should be published. Before the liberal do-gooders jump on me I can't see what harm it would do.
4

Alien in Orton,

14/10/2008 16:53:57
I back your statement 200% TravDav
5

John Barnes,

Peterborough 14/10/2008 19:00:09
I think its disgusting that the firemen broke into the adjoining house regardless of the risk to that property and think they should be arrested for breaking and entry. After all its no differenf than an innocent citizen going to help a victim being mugged in the street and `restraining` the perpetrator and then getting arrested for his efforts. Come on , lets have consistency!
6

Fentyke,

14/10/2008 19:56:50
John, Are you having a laugh. I take your point over the consistancy but I actually lived in the adjoining property for 15 years and were I still living there, I'd be mighty appreciative of Fireman Sam and his mates right now. I've seen that loft and how open it is and having seen how quick the Bradford Valley Parade fire spread, once that fire reached the loft space, I can easily imagine how the smoke would have filled our house in next to no time. At 4.30 am it would be almost certain that me, de wife and 2 kids would have been fast asleep and with a house full of noxious smoke, we'd have little chance of waking up if it wasn't for Sam & Co.
7

Fentyke,

14/10/2008 20:00:21
Forgot to say that consequently i've got nothing but thanks for The Fireman. Had I been there they would of saved the lives of me and my family.
8

Fentyke,

14/10/2008 20:01:05
Forgot to say that consequently i've got nothing but thanks for The Fireman. Had I been there they would of saved the lives of me and my family.
9

Bodie,

15/10/2008 11:08:00
What a load of tosh John Barnes. Do you think the fire service go breaking into houses just for the sake of it ? There was very good reason for them breaking in as the fire can rapidly spread through the common space of the lofts. To suggest they should be arrested for breaking and entering is beyond belief. You must be a complete and utter moron to think that ! The fire service, as with all the emergency services, have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to do precisely what they did. It is their job to protect life and property. Had they not done so and property was further damaged, injuries caused or lives lost there would have been justified causes for complaint. And as for your comment about innocent citizens being arrested for detaining offenders, the only criteria they have to worry about is using unnecessary or unreasonable force. As long as the use of any force can be justified to a Court there is no problem.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.