Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Anti-speed sign stolen on its first day of use



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 January 2009
A groundbreaking hi-tech community scheme, aimed at reducing speeding on the city's roads, was launched in Peterborough on Friday (2 January).
Speedwatch, a £3,000 device is the latest kit to be deployed in the fight to improve safety – but with the twist that volunteers from the community , rather than police, are the operators.

However , the launch of the pilot scheme yesterday suffered a blow when one of the signswarning drivers that their speeds were being monitored was stolen from Coniston Road, in Gunthorpe.

Councillor Colin Burton, the first member of the public to take the DIY kit out, only noticed it was missing when he went to pack up and set out to collect the sign which was out of sight round a corner .

He said: "I went to fetch the warning sign at 3pmand it was gone. I have no idea who took it, it could have been anyone as it was out of my sight.

"Why someone would take it is anyone idea. It's a shame but it doesn't take anything away from the scheme.

Police say that they will advise volunteers in future to make sure the signs remain within.

For yesterday's exercise Cllr Burton was joined by city MP Stewart Jackson, who set up the easy-to-use equipment in minutes.

Speedwatch consists of a portable,battery-operated speed sign, which gives readings of the time, date and speed of vehicles going past, and it made its debut on a busy section of Lincoln Road, between Werrington Parkway and Church Street.

Residents had claimed speeding drivers were putting the lives of the elderly and schoolchildren at risk. But in two hours 400 cars went past the checkpoint and just three drivers were clocked doing 33mph, and one at 37mph.

Cllr Burton said: "It worked because it has done its job.Most people saw the warning signs and slowed down.

"The four people we clocked are exactly the people this is aimed at, they have ignored the signs and are still blatantly flouting the speed limit. These are the people we need to slowdown."

Those drivers will now be sent warning letters by the sector inspector advising that they have been caught speeding, because there can be no prosecutions using the finding of the volunteer-operated Speed watch kit.

Residents on Lincoln Road said that they support the scheme.

Grandmother , Diane Leach said: "I think anything you can do to stop speeding on this road is a good thing.

"My grandchildren go to Werrington Primary School and crossing the road is a nightmare for them due to the speed of cars."

Another resident, Richard Wake- field said the device's presence had definitely slowed the traffic down, but still thinks more should be done.

He said: "The only problem is it may have improved things in the short term, but what happens when it goes? It's the long term issue that needs looking at."

Neighbourhood policing sergeant Alan Bradshaw declared himself pleased with the inaugural run, despite the theft of the sign.

He said: "It's the first live deployment of the kit and it obviously worked as drivers speeds were visibly reduced."

The full article contains 536 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 January 2009 8:35 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

sonnyjim,

05/01/2009 09:04:25
A spokesman for the police union 'CopsRus' denied that any of his members were involved and said that contrary to popular opinion, Police at grass roots level were fully supportive of the initiative in spite of the potential loss of police revenue.
2

Ma Hubbard,

05/01/2009 09:34:53
If the main concern was to stop speeding drivers because of the proximity of a school, then why was the speed sign not used on a week day during the school run instead of on a Sunday? Unless that was the plan before it was stolen...

"Why someone would take it is anyone idea." - My guess is that it's a £3,000 device left unattended!
3

BKK,

05/01/2009 10:02:56
Obviously grammar wasn't on the list of New Years resolutions for the ET journalists this year!

I agree with Ma, a £3000 sign is pretty good incentive for theft. Either that, or some 14 year old has it on his wall and is basking in the glow of the Radar emitter :)
4

LJ.,

Standing in the middle of the road aiming a speed 05/01/2009 11:45:31
Hmmmm Why was the device out of their sight? Were the operators hiding in bushes? Everything, including the operators should be visible to the motorist or we get these snidey Hidden Gatso tactics again. Dont get me wrong I'm all for speeding controls but I dont think its for members of the public to operate as there looks to be a recipe for violence there.
5

AliV,

05/01/2009 11:59:37
Well I am perosnally glad our police service is spending out hard earned money on such a worth cause for busybodies.

To catch these people who are doing 33mph in a 30 zone has to continue even though that is within the 10% margin of error you would get with most speedometers.
6

aw29,

Peterborough 05/01/2009 12:12:31
Will Stewart Jackson and Colin Burton be asked to pay for the loss of the equipment whilst it was in their care?
7

Trebs,

05/01/2009 13:23:05
The device itself is £3000; the sign is not £3000, it's just a warning sign, placed by the road when the monitoring is happening. It is the sign that has been stolen, not the device, but that isn't too clear from the article, despite me re-reading it a few times
8

BKK,

05/01/2009 13:55:06
Yeah Trebs, you're right it is hard to tell what is what from this article (much like other articles from the ET). The picture above looks like a nice big LED driven sign, not hard to imagine that with a radar sensor it costs £3k. Am guessing they "lost" a normal fold out plastic sign warning of the Man-with-Speed-gun around the corner, and they still have the actual gun-type-device.
9

giger,

02/02/2009 08:16:42
Maybe they should ask the volunteers to pay for it, as it was after all them who lost it :o)

Considering police have to be highly trained to use speeding equipment, I am guessing that the readings taken by these people are only 80% accurate at best.
10

Herdwick,

02/02/2009 20:42:52
Sounds like a vigilante scheme to me.

Can I have a set of handcuffs and a CS gas canister to add to my baseball bat so I can take action to reduce crime in the city ?

If not why is it OK to equip these idiots to "reduce speeding". I hope they can run fast or have private medical insurance so the speed gun can be removed from where someone will end up pushing it.

I also hope all the "volunteers" never park illegally (for example facing the wrong way without lights at night) or they'll be getting reported and "sent warning letters by the sector inspector advising that they have been caught".

What does the Data Protection Act have to say about plebs recording the whereabouts of members of the public - is this not personal data ?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.