Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Animal ban for couple who neglected pet dog



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 March 2008
A HUSBAND and wife duo were banned from keeping animals for life after their dog had to be put down due to neglect.
Horrified RSPCA officers discovered painful, bleeding cracks on German Shepherd Becky's body, as well as several lumps of skin hanging off her.

Her owners Paula (41) and John (51) Day, of Eastbourne Road, Chatteris, had left her chained to an outside kennel, causing her to develop a severe skin condition and lose hair from across her body.

They had also failed to get her treated for an eye infection and ear problems and had let her claws grow overly long.

At Wisbech Magistrates' Court on Tuesday, as well as banning them from keeping animals for life, a district judge gave them each an eight-week custodial sentence suspended for 12 months, ordered them to do 200 hours of unpaid work each and told to pay £600 costs between them.

The pair had previously pleaded guilty to causing unnecessary suffering by failing to provide veterinary treatment for Becky, a black and tan coloured dog, in October last year.

The six-year-old pooch's condition was so bad that the examining vet advised that she be put down to prevent further suffering. The vet said Becky had been suffering for at least four months.

In sentencing, District Judge John Sheraton said this was one of the most serious cases of neglect of a dog he had seen in his career. He also said the owners had turned a blind eye to their dog's suffering.

Speaking after the court hearing, RSPCA inspector Jon Knight said: "Neglecting an animal can cause them to suffer every bit as much as if they are deliberately cruelly-treated.

"We are therefore very pleased that this case was taken so seriously by the court and hope that this sentence sends out a clear message to other owners to provide an adequate standard of care for their pets."

The Days are not the only people from the area to be banned from keeping animals. In March last year, Aaron Hall (26) and Samantha Parker (23), of Dingley Court, Westwood, Peterborough, were banned from keeping animals for three years after pleading guilty to a charge of causing unnecessary suffering to a dog.

Their Great Dane and Alsatian crossbreed, Rebel, was discovered emaciated to the point of starvation.

In September, Jennifer Hall (29) of School Close, Bretton, Peterborough, was banned from keeping animals after two of her tiny pups died after she left them while she went away on holiday.

And in December 2006, mother and daughter Peggy and Eve Hunt, of Fengate Close, Peterborough, were banned from keeping animals for life for a second time after RSCPA inspectors found dogs and cats living in cramped and dirty conditions.

The full article contains 469 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 March 2008 8:57 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

rljs,

peterborough 06/03/2008 09:14:59
i say people who neglect any animal should be made to suffer the same way they made that animal suffer
2

Hissing Cyd,

Peterborough 06/03/2008 13:14:04
Plenty of names and address's here so why cannot rapists and Kiddy Fiddlers be named and shamed in the same way?.
3

EmmaB,

06/03/2008 14:28:12
I just don't get it, and do you know what as far as I'm concered, animals are better than people. People can be so evil, but animals just survive and live by nature.
I mean how abnormal are we?! To treat animals how we want without a second thought, or to treat other people as Hissing Cyd has mentioned, or take advantage of and destroy our own planet?!
I just don't get it.
4

Alan Yaxley,

Yaxley 06/03/2008 16:19:59
Here we go again, poor old animals ! This is just a story of someone not properly looking after a dog, probably couldnt afford the vet bills so never took it to a vet and couldnt afford proper food either, then by the time they realise they have a problem they are too embarressed to take it to a vet or seek help because they know how they will be treated.
I dont agree with treating animals badly but it always seems to me animals get more pity than people. If for example a taxi driver gets beaten up and robbed it gets a small mention but if a puppy is kicked or dumped somewhere it becomes front page news !
People should sort thier priorities. All the puppies in the world are not worth one human life.
5

EmmaB,

06/03/2008 16:27:35
Personally Alan, I disagree with your comments.
How arrogant are we to say our life is much more worthwile than that of another life whether it be human or animal?!!
It just reinforces my original post that people are very selfish.
If you look back on the archives of this website Alan, you will find there are many more stories about people being attacked than animal ones.
Don't misunderstand me I get very upset when I read articles about people being victimised as I do about animals - what makes me sad is that the sort of narrow minded people that walk this earth.
We should all respect each other, and respect the animals and enviroment together - does that happen? No.
Selfishness=Ugliness
And before you get on your high horse, I do not agree with extremist animal rights protesters either!!!
6

Claire40,

06/03/2008 16:52:14
EmmaB, totally agree with you. I also believe that the way in which people treat/relate to animals says a lot about the way in which they relate to other people as well.
7

Alan Yaxley,

Yaxley 06/03/2008 17:38:23
Just making the distiction between humans and animals.
In real life nature is much more harsh and animals attack each other all the time and not just for food, they do it for dominance, survival of the fittest is real in the animal world.
I work with pigs, have done for 20 years and people always think "Ah, sweet piggy" the reality is that these pigs would kill each other if they could get together and for no other reason other than to be "top pig", people should spend more time looking out for each other than sticking up for so called animal rights.
If all the money given to animal charities was given to childline or cancer research then the world would be a better place. Did you know the Cat Protection League want £50 from you if you wish to have one of thier rescued cats, its no wonder they have hundreds of the things is it ?
If you find a stray cat give it say 14 days for the owner to come forward, if not claimed they have it put down. Save all the money of feeding it and keeping it warm and give it to a homeless person.
PEOPLE SHOULD COME FIRST.
8

EmmaB,

06/03/2008 17:59:32
I respect your views Alan of course.
Yes animals fight for dominance, and survival of the fittest - so why do people attack, rape and murder other people? Ok you could say it's for dominance, but I think it is more just because they feel they can.
Animals don't kill each other needlessly it is just a case of a quick scuffle - assert who is boss, and that is that - which us usually the case with pack animals, but I don't know anything about pig behaviour.
I know the Cats Proetction ask for a donation of £50, but it is only a donation, and for them to carry out their work they need money.
I don't quite get your last paragraph - give a cat to a homeless person, but then a homeless person can only just about care for themselves let alone an animal - so a little contradictory when you say 'people come first'. Either that or you meant give the cat to a homeless person for food!?
Hehe.
9

Alan Yaxley,

Yaxley 06/03/2008 18:05:44
No but not a bad idea !

Save the money of feeding the cat/dog whatever and give the money to the homeless person.

And if the Cats Protection people charged less more people would take a cat from them and then thier costs would be lower.

People rape and kill ??? So do animals !!!

Im all for a DNA database and microchipping.
10

EmmaB,

06/03/2008 18:14:10
Lol I read it wrong!

We are all individual and have different ideas about things.

I also agree on microchipping/DNA database.

I prefer the company of animals because I have generally been treated better by animals than people - but then I have not yet made friends with a tiger.

Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.