Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Peterborough City Council website

'No conflict' over Peterborough recycling centre plans

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
20 November 2009
LEADING Peterborough councillors have rejected a call to stand down in the wake of concerns about multi-million pound plans to build a waste-to-energy centre.
Peterborough City Council is poised to build its own £58 million state-of-the-art waste-to-energy recycling centre, in Storeys Bar Road, Fengate, and is currently tendering for a partner with the expertise to help construct the venture.

Council leader Councillor Marco Cereste is also a director on the board of Peterborough Renewable Energy (PREL), which has just been given the go ahead by the Government to build a separate £250 million energy-from-waste centre, also on Storeys Bar Road. And council cabinet member John Holdich is father-in-law to PREL managing director, Chris Williams.

Now English Democrat councillors, Stephen Goldspink and Graham Murphy, have called on Cllr Cereste and Cllr Holdich to stand down from their leadership positions until the tendering process has been completed at the end of next year.

They say it should be clear there are no conflicts of interest in the council's dealings over the proposed energy centres. Cllr Goldspink said: "It seems only reasonable to assume they would consider their own positions.

But Cllr Cereste said: "I am not in the slightest bit interested in the council incinerator and my company hasn't or will not be bidding for it. I am not doing anything wrong, nor am I hiding anything from anyone, neither will I be standing down as leader."

In a statement, a council spokesperson said: "It is disappointing that two members of the council have chosen to attack the council and its officers in this way. The inference that members have not properly registered interests is misinformed and misleading. All members of the council are fully aware of their obligations under their Code of Conduct and their need to comply with it and the sanctions that may be imposed on them if they do not do so. Part of the Code requires them to register and declare certain personal interests they have and to consider whether at any time if they may prejudicial when dealing with any of the council's business.

"Members are acutely aware of this obligation and conscientious in doing this and checking the situation if they are in any doubts. To be clear, Councillor Cereste has always been open about declaring that he is a Director of PREL both in the register of members' interests and generally to avoid any confusion or allegations such as this. Councillor Holdich has also been open about fact that his son in law is managing director of PREL.

Plans for Peterborough City Council's recycling centre.
Plans for Peterborough City Council's recycling centre.


However, his particular interest is not required by law or the Code to be registered as a personal interest in the Members' register but under paragraph 8 (1) (b) of the Code he has to declare it whenever relevant business is to be discussed.

"Neither Councillor Cereste or Councillor Holdich are, or will be involved, in making any decisions affecting PREL.

"In fact, Councillor Lee as the Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Environment Capital and Culture is taking the lead on any such matters.

"The council is not refusing to acknowledge that a problem might exist. Quite simply, there is not a problem to address and all relevant steps are being taken to ensure the decision making and process are all robust and legal.

Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 20 November 2009 2:12 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2 3 4
1

Pull The Other Juan,

20/11/2009 14:54:33
Ha! I love the fact the Goldspink and Murphy are stitching up their old mates.
Even if Cereste has breached no rules, his reputation must surely be tarnished by the fact there is a clear conflict of interest here.
2

Steeler,

20/11/2009 15:12:29
Whilst it could well be true that Cereste and Holdich have done 'nothing illegal' and have behaved 'by the rules' I would suggest that in the current climate any phrases of that ilk are not the most likely to engender belief by others and might not be sufficient in 'the court of public opinion'.

This is not a time for politicians to be indignant thinking that their well known and highly respected integrity will carry the day.

The public these days are more likely to ask "Who nominated Cereste for council leade?, Who endowed Lee and Holdich with their cabinet positions? Rather than just smile and say "That's OK then" when assurances are given
3

Ma Hubbard,

20/11/2009 16:03:17
Surely Cereste's leadership in the council is a conflict of interest on more than one count? What about Opportunity Peterborough? Can he not propose development with one hand and sign it off with the other?
4

A Seymour,

20/11/2009 16:34:12
This all sounds so much like MP's bleating "I've done nothing wrong" "Its within the rules" like MP's expenses it may be within the rules but that doesn't make it right. This really shows what being a councillor is all about these day for some people.
5

DonB,

Peterborough 20/11/2009 16:44:41
Get them built and cut the bickering.
6

loob,

20/11/2009 17:16:07
Its not what you know its who, funny how cereste gets funding for some of his other buisnesses! and wont say how he managed it .
7

,

20/11/2009 18:11:07
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
8

Steeler,

20/11/2009 18:32:54
I've taken your advice and googled as you suggested Hampton here.

Since I can find nothing racist about the English Democrats, indeed they go out of their way to include all those who currently live, legally, in England in an attempt to ensure that all of them are not expected to carry too great a burden on the welfare state culture that being English embodies. Nor that they should just accept that they have to accept an ever more crowded island without having a say in the matter.

Which leaves one wondering what your agenda is Hampton. The hurling of such an abusive term when a clear counter argument could not be mustered has given us the BNP.
9

Hampton here,

20/11/2009 18:55:50
Steeler - try this:
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/english-democrats/48214-english-democrats-they-racist-party.html

as an example. Another is the ED Mayor of Doncaster cancelling all translation services as "asylum seekers should learn english before they arrive".

No agenda - just pointing out that people have to be careful.

Not sure I agree with your last point. The BNP (National Front) has been countered with very clear arguments over many years. Rascism has been countered with very clear arguments over many years. Or are you saying the arguments are so poor against rascism that we need the BNP?

10

Robert Harris,

Peterborough 20/11/2009 18:58:49
Bet you would love to see the un edited version.

Prev
1
2 3 4

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.