Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

£290,000 overspend for city growth agency



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 August 2008
THE agency responsible for planning the future of the city overspent its budget by almost £300,000 last year
But it explained the extra cash was available because it had under-spent in the previous year.

Not-for-profit urban regeneration company Opportunity Peterborough, which received £1.8 million of public cash in the last financial year, has said the
overspend was "intentionally achieved" following a £235,000 underspend in the preceding year.

The deficit was revealed in OP's yearly accounts, which were released as part of the company's annual review yesterday.

Director of strategic growth Steve Bowyer told The Evening Telegraph that the deficit was a result of OP initiatives, such as the Integrated Growth Strategy (IGS), which were initially earmarked to go ahead in the April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007 financial year, being "re-programmed" to the following 12-month period.

Mr Bowyer said: "The re-programming was not to the detriment of the city. It was about getting the right job done at the right price. The loss needs to be looked at in the context of the previous year's £235,000 surplus."

OP, which is jointly funded by Peterborough City Council, the East of England Development Agency, the Department for Communities and Local Government and English Partnerships, reported a total spend of £2.16 million last year, compared to an income of £1.86 million.

Last year, Opportunity Peterborough received £250,000 from the city council.

Mr Bowyer said it was essential that projects such as the IGS, which is being incorporated into the council's Core Strategy, were not started prematurely in order to establish a "clear way of growing".

After a year of rigorous planning and consultation, the final recommendation of the IGS was the construction of an additional 17,000 homes by 2026, leading to the creation of two urban extensions to the south and east of Peterborough.

In addition, the IGS envisaged the creation of 24,600 jobs on 80 hectares of designated employment land over the next 18 years. Reflecting on OP's performance in the last financial year, Mr Bowyer said: "It was a successful year, both in terms of planning and delivery. Having said that, I expect the current year to be even more successful."

By April 2009, Mr Bowyer said he hoped a planning application would have been submitted for a 450-home Carbon Challenge site, work will have started to transform Cathedral Square, and plans for North Westgate, the South Bank and the Station Quarter should have reached a more advanced stage.

He said: "I'm aware that people say they have heard this all before, but OP wants the right development for the city.



The full article contains 454 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 08 August 2008 3:29 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

captainsawdust,

08/08/2008 16:04:45
To many imports here and advertising there Businesses and Servives in the ET !!!
2

John Pinter,

08/08/2008 18:10:06
The place is overstaffed. Let some of them go!
3

SokeBoy,

08/08/2008 18:54:42
Even if North Westgate is built it will be a huge white elephant.

We still delude ourselves that we can shop and build our way out of environmental and economic problems. This is not an approach an aspiring 'Environment Capital' should be adopting.
4

Joff,

Peterborough 09/08/2008 01:18:25
If they underspent we'd complain they aren't allocating the money correctly, if they overspend we say they're not planning properly and if they hit dead on budget I'm sure people would raise an eyebrow and suggest there was some book fiddling going on anyway.

Whilst I don't fully agree with all their plans, I'm in favour of OP and think it will be an interesting time for the City over the next few years.
5

A higher presence,

12/08/2008 14:34:55
What a load of wasters. The city council could easily produce these pointless strategies without wasting millions of our cash! Sack the lot of them.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.