Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Readers' letters: City market offers best value for your money 20/08/2008



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 August 2008
I WRITE in response to the letter from L Dyball ("Shops should cut the cost of fruit", ET, August 12).
I would like to ask if she has considered not shopping at supermarkets in order to reduce her shopping bill?

Peterborough City Market has a host of fruit and veg stalls which sell their goods at a fraction of the cost of those at Tesco, right next door to the market.

Also, the butcher and fishmonger in the food hall sell their meat and fish at much lower prices than the supermarkets and, in my opinion, the quality is much better.

People of Peterborough should use this market, otherwise we shall all be left at the mercy of the supermarkets – overcharging the consumer, putting small local businesses and farmers out of business, using unethical farming methods, and overpacking their goods.

Those who do visit the market will be greeted with a friendly smile and a chat, as the stallholders get to know you. Admittedly, you can't get the whole of the weekly shop there, but we have greatly reduced our shopping bill by buying everything that we can at the market, including non-food goods, and by buying as little as possible from the supermarkets.

It can be a pleasant experience – please try it.
SARAH MARSDEN
Fletton,
Peterborough


Plenty of allotments are ready for use
If Eric Dent is looking for an allotment (Your Telegraph, August 14) we would be more than happy to help.
He is mistaken in stating that we have no available plots, as there are more than 130 available for new tenants at the Wesleyan Road and Bluebell allotment sites, as well as a small number of other vacancies across the city.
Allotment holders have the opportunity to grow organic fruit and vegetables in season, reduce their food miles and help the environment while experiencing the taste, freshness, variety and choice not always available in the supermarkets.
All the sites are fenced and secure, water is provided from standpipes and the city council allows sheds, greenhouses and polytunnels subject to an application.
Allotment holders might even like to keep a few hens or rabbits, and the city council can even arrange to rotovate a new plot.
Allotments are rented on an annual basis and are based on a standard 10 pole (300 sq yd) plot. Smaller or larger plots are charged pro rata.
The standard charge is £50 per year, with @ctive card concessions available.
n For more information, call Nick King at Peterborough City Council on 01733 747474, or visit www.peterborough.gov.uk
LOUISE WILCOX
Recreation manager,
Peterborough City
Council


Prison is not right answer
RE: Stewart Jackson MP's column ("It's a criminally raw deal", ET, August 14).
Mr Jackson's comments calling for more prison places and longer sentences for criminals show his misunderstanding of the causes of crime and the best way to treat re-offenders.
He is correct in his acknowledgement that the majority of crime is committed by a minority of people, however his
solution is to have them "breaking rocks in a prison on a semi-permanent basis". Simply putting offenders away for longer periods of time does not address the origin of the problem.
The fact that a large amount of people live very close to the poverty line, especially in the current economic climate, may perhaps give him some clue as to why certain people turn to crime.
If you don't address the social roots of the problem, you will never find a solution.
Building more prisons will
certainly not achieve this,
however, addressing the widening gap between rich and poor in a society where 10 per cent of wage earners in society own 54 per cent of personal wealth might.
DANIEL SMALL
via e-mail


Building's history explained
IT is surely inaccurate to keep referring to the building where the central post office is located as the Corn Exchange.
The Corn Exchange was demolished about 40 years ago. It was a large, square building of yellow brick which seemed to have no windows, though there were one or two ground floor shops.
I don't know when it ceased to be used as a corn exchange, but in my youth it was used, among other things, for auctions and wrestling.
The current building was once described by Sir John Betjeman, former Poet Laureate and architecture critic, as "a silly egg box of a building."
TONY ALLEN
Airedale Close,
Peterborough

The full article contains 754 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 August 2008 11:52 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Dan Jackson,

20/08/2008 18:11:04
Daniel Small you are obviously one of the PC Brigade who has caused the downturn in this country. Lower sentences and twenty chances lets people just do what they want and the workers and law abiding suffer.

Time to build another 120,000 prison places. Then make every crime from shoplifting to drunk and assault mean jail. 1000 pound fines for drunk and disorderly and minimum sentences for rape, murder etc of 10+ years.

Once there is a fear to commit crime then people will think twice and the crime rate will drop.

Sadly with PC idiots like you this will never happen and jails will continue to be holiday camps.
2

FTR,

21/08/2008 08:17:21
I once ran into some lads looking to commit crime on our estate in the middle of the night whose reason for targeting the area was because it was a "rich area". Their evidence for this? A 14 year old BMW parked nearby. The state was nothing more than terraced and semi-detached houses occupied by hardworking people. It's just not poverty that forces people into crime. Some of them are too thick to do much else.
3

reded,

21/08/2008 12:14:44
FTR - We do have a problem too many people are simply thick.
Many who commit crime are stupid, when I was a member of the serious crime squad, it was remarkable how stupid some serious and organised criminals would be - leaving evidence on tapes and even at friends houses. Many others do not know right from wrong and in prison the majority have the reading ages of children. Many also have medical conditions that would best be treated by the mental health service rather than a stretch in jail. In Peterborough we have also seen trafficked workers end up in jail for working for drugs cartels (skunk farmers)... I would rather see the houses used for this confiscated from the owners or drug suppliers and them prosecuted successfully than have penniless modern day bondage workers sent to jail.

Fortunately most people know the difference between right and wrong and do not commit crimes. The majority of people do not simply mug, rob or steal when they see an opportunity to get away with it. Deterrents are important but so is education and individuals growing up to know what is right. There was a period in the 80's when it seemed normal and all right to do something if you could get away with it - "loads of money" and all that. Housing benefit fraud, tax fraud, ignoring traffic rules, making millions in dodgy deals, invading countries, selling of the national assets. The USA has a massive prison population and execute young men with metal health problems - It is also one of the most dangerous "civilised nations" with many more murders than in the UK. Places like Switzerland and Iceland with tiny prison populations have low crime rates. These states have highly educated people and less inequality and poverty than in the UK or USA.

4

Bodie,

27/08/2008 11:51:10
Career criminals merely regard prison as an occupational hazard and not a deterrent. If it was actually a deterrent there would be less crime. Bang them up with bread and water and no luxuries. But of course that would infringe their human rights wouldn't it ! Once they are banged up they should lose all their "rights". Seems they have more rights than their victims.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.