Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Readers' letter: No decent provision for cyclists - 19/07/08



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

I am writing in response to Ian Miller's comments on cycling on pavements published in Thursday's ET.
Mr Miller is fed up of cyclists using the pavements when legally they are not entitled to do so. He contacted Peterborough City Council, which said it was an enforcement issue, and as such he should contact the police. However, although it is the responsibility of Cambridgeshire police to enforce the law, the council has a responsibility to the public to provide safe routes for all road users.

Cyclists have to contend with busier and busier roads and cycle routes that join to footpaths. The picture that was shown next to Mr Miller's letter was of the very narrow footpath over Crescent Bridge. The cycle route stops on the east side of this bridge, and then cyclists are expected to cross the three lanes of heavy traffic to continue on their journey along Thorpe Road. This is dangerous, and as an experienced cyclist I would not attempt to do this, never mind asking a child or someone with little road confidence to do that. But that is what the law and the council expects cyclists to do. This is unreasonable.

The cycle lanes the council installed on Taverners Road that Mr Miller refers to are narrower than the minimum required standard and, therefore, cyclists get pushed into the kerb or have to contend with aggressive drivers stuck behind them.

Cyclists just want to get to the destination in peace. Very often they choose to cycle on the pavement instead as a result. This then affects pedestrians too, as you cannot often hear cycles coming, which causes animosity between the two groups. This is unnecessary when there are plenty of examples across the land and abroad that could alleviate the problem if the council was serious about encouraging cycling and walking.

I am a member of the new CycleSay lobby group for Peterborough, which was set up especially to address some of these problems. We actively campaign to change things for the better for both walkers and cyclists. Most problems are caused by poor design which desperately needs to change if Peterborough wants to increase its environmental stance on the ground. If anyone wants to have their say about the issues CycleSay are working on, visit our website at www.cyclesay.org.uk

Geraldine Walker
Via e-mail

The full article contains 404 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 July 2008 8:56 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

nnooop,

Dogsthorpe 21/07/2008 09:50:37
yes - some Peterborough road are narrow - they were never intended to be used by such a high volume of traffic as they are. However the law is the law and must be upheld - after all it would never be acceptable for cars and lorries to use the pavement.
2

KiwiinPboro,

21/07/2008 15:35:03
It is illeagl for cyclists to ride on pavements unless there is signage saying cycling is specifically allowed.
3

Postie supporter,

21/07/2008 23:12:45
These mindless idiots are complete scum and have no decency, respect etc whatsoever. So fine them heavilly no payment remove all their rights to healthcare, benefits free education for the completly obnoxius scumbag brats removed for life.
4

Outcast,

using Ubuntu 23/07/2008 16:19:12
I drive a 44 tonner and I do NOT have any desire to squidge a cyclist. I ride a treadlie to work myself around two or three times a week.

I have instructed my daughters to ride on the pavement if there are no cycleways .. But in a responsible fashion and ALWAYS give pedestrians 100% right of way even if that means getting off and pushing it past them.
5

Outcast,

23/07/2008 16:23:13
Added to above

As for it being the law. Just because something is Law doesn't make it sensible or right.

There is Legally right

and

Morally right.

If a law was passed that stated people who's names started with the letter K to immediately jump off beachy head would you blindly follow that law ?

Use common sense.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should police use social networking sites more to help solve crimes?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.