Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Julia Ogden: on the effects of TV on children


More than just a mum - 13/11/08

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 November 2008
CONCERNS about the effect television programmes have on our children's behaviour is never far from the news.
I am not completely convinced by the argument that if children see something violent on television they will copy it, but I am always amazed at how much influence some programmes have over my young son.

I do try to vet what he sees, but I am growing increasingly frustrated with programmes, supposedly made for children, which are unnecessarily violent.

Jetix is the Sky channel permanently stuck on our television – the programmes which have captured my son's imagination the most are Power Rangers Operation Overdrive and Ninja Storm.

On these shows scary aliens/monsters which live in parallel universes try to destroy the Rangers and subsequently lead the world into the "dark ways". This involves many fight scenes in which, despite being repeatedly blown up and smashed over the head with ferocious looking weapons, our heroes walk away unscathed.

Consequently, my son thinks people are invincible – which is not particularly healthy.

Then there are the movies which, although heavily promoted on channels watched by younger viewers, are completely unsuitable for under 12s. I am thinking in particular of the Marvel comic book heroes, namely Spider-man, The Hulk, Iron Man and the X-Men. All these films have been given 12 certificates and are incredibly violent, yet my young son loves the cartoons and desperately wants to see the movies.

Last week my husband and I got the Transformers film out on DVD to see if it was suitable for Samuel to watch. Well, it isn't. This is not because of the fight scenes, which although plentiful are not too horrific, it is because of the swearing. If the characters didn't use such profanities, the film would be enjoyable family fun.

So, I would like to ask, why do the film makers think it is necessary to include such language – does it add anything to the storyline? No. Of course it doesn't.

Rather shockingly we recorded Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban the other day on Sky Plus. We had just seen the first Harry Potter movie on DVD and really enjoyed it. I, rather stupidly thought all the Harry Potter films were a PG rating, particularly as the books are written for children, so allowed Samuel to watch this third film in the series.

Not only does one of the characters swear several times, the scene where Voldermort comes back to life is terrifying. Our young son will now not go to the toilet on his own in case there is a wizard behind the door, and is dreaming of witches jumping out of his bedroom cupboard.

Although I do not think these films will scar him for life, I do think the film makers should be a bit more responsible.

I know it is up to us parents to say "No" to our children but it would be nice if Hollywood could help make this just a bit easier.

The full article contains 508 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 November 2008 4:34 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

katiebell,

Los Angeles 14/11/2008 16:06:45
Er, Voldemort doesn't come back to life in Prisoner of Azkaban. His character isn't even in the film. More likely, you were watching Goblet of Fire, which isn't really a film meant for young children. You should have been more responsible as a parent, at least enough to check the film's rating (which is UK-12). And you should have been more responsible as a journalist when browbeating a film that is appropriate for kids, which Prisoner of Azkaban certainly is with its UK-PG rating.
2

Amanda The Sheep,

Bourne 16/11/2008 21:52:18
What's with the apostrophe?

It's not effect's....it's effects....I thought journos could spell?
3

Tarnshark,

17/11/2008 10:18:28
Harry Potter films aren't meant for small children? Get a life Katie.
4

Iron Man,

Werrington 17/11/2008 22:35:45
My son also found the Harry Potter films scary - he saw the trailer to film 1 and was frightened!! He has now managed to watch the first two and really enjoyed them - it just took a while! He has decided the third is too scary at the moment so we are waiting until he feels ready. Instead we are lisetning to the books on audio tape read by Stephen Fry which is magical and not too scary.

I find with the books they really get his imagination going, but it isn't super scary because his imagination is limited by the boundaries of what he thinks is possible in the scaryness stakes...not sure if this makes any sense!!
5

Mona Lott,

18/11/2008 16:07:39
Remove the unwarranted apostrophe please, it offends me.
6

Amanda The Sheep,

Bourne 18/11/2008 17:55:28
Ha ha Mona Lott....you put it so much better than I did!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.