Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Peterborough City Council website

Report: Peterborough hospitals criticised for patient deaths

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
01 December 2009
A REVIEW of Peterborough hospitals will be carried out after they were given one of the worst safety ratings in the country in the Dr Foster Health Guide.
The Dr Foster Health Guide revealed that more people are dying than is expected at Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust's hospitals, which are Peterborough District, Edith Cavell and Stamford.

In 2008/09, the trust's Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) was 112.4, meaning that 12.4 per cent of deaths at the hospitals were above what was expected.

The trust's record with heart attack patients was also highlighted, with independent health watchdog Dr Foster giving it a score of 176.33, meaning 76 per cent more heart attack patients died than was expected.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) recently rated the trust's quality of services as "fair", up from "weak" the year previous, but Dr Foster's patient safety score puts the trust at joint 14th from bottom in the country.

Director of nursing Chris Wilkinson said: "The trust is surprised and concerned that it was rated high for its HSMR data, as it constantly monitors hospital mortality and is immediately alerted to any unusual or concerning trends.

"Establishing why the trust reported a higher level of patient mortality is of critical importance, and we have begun a detailed investigation involving colleagues from Dr Foster."

Ms Wilkinson said that Dr Foster changing some of its ratings methods may have impacted on its scores, such as if a surgery patient had an underlying health problem that wasn't included on paperwork, it would go down as a preventable death.

The HSMR is calculated based on details such as patient age, severity of illness and social background, which are used to work out how many patients would be expected to die at each hospital.

This is compared with the number of patients that actually die. If the numbers are the same, the hospital gets a score of 100. If the number is ten per cent more, it gets 110.

The trust refused to reveal how many patients had died in its hospitals in 2008/09.

Related link:
Dr Foster's 2009 Hospital Guide - Focus on Patient Safety.

Dr Foster Research - search by hospital.

Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust's hospitals.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 December 2009 10:18 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

PANJO,

01/12/2009 11:15:50
This shouldnt be happening. The Government has spent billions on the NHS, promising the tax payer an improved service.

Very worrying what I have read and heard. More to the point what are they going to do to put it right.
2

razorisback ,

01/12/2009 11:24:25
this doesnt suprise me at all
3

EmmaB,

01/12/2009 11:33:14
Why doesn't it surprise you Razor?
4

EmmaB,

01/12/2009 12:09:51
To Slippery Fox. And you'd think those kids living in doorways could afford their own health insurance?
5

lefttheland,

01/12/2009 12:15:20
No surprises there then.
Cluttered wards, no discipline, lack of hygiene, too many ? clean visitors per bed, inadequate showering & loo facilities, high tech nursing and not enough staff for basic care, insufficient patient diet, communication problems, outdated facilities etc etc etc etc
BUT : maybe this will all change when the super hospital is opened. Lets hope so.

6

Cherrypops,

peterborough 01/12/2009 12:22:06
No surprise really! Its also disgusting. Some of the staff are so rude too !!
7

A Seymour,

01/12/2009 12:48:46
The hospitals are not cleaned properly that's the problem many years ago each ward had full time cleaners on the ward all day now its just a quick run through and on to the next one. Privatisation of cleaning services is the reason standards of cleanliness are very lapse. Still on the plus side the execs will probably get a big bonus after all they have high death rate and most of the hospital was without power for 46hrs recently due to poor disaster recovery planning. I agree some nursing staff are better than others but what can you expect with such poor leadership from the top.
8

razorisback ,

01/12/2009 13:02:33
medicare is that system where millions americans cant afford
9

Sofedup,

01/12/2009 13:29:10
Get back in your box slippery fox
I don't want it to be like the USA where chasing the almighty dollar and owning a gun is more important that being civilised and caring about the next human being. There are enough resources to feed, clothe, house and care for every human being on this earth, unfortunatedly there are too many greedy people out there who want more than their fair share and more than the next man just to make him feel superior. Ring a bell slippery?
10

The BANDWRECKER,

Peterborough 01/12/2009 13:32:32
Get real! The US health system is a joke just look at the queues that form when free health care is given out to those who can't afford it. Also a lot of the insurers don't even pay out in the end anyway.

I agree that the cleaning standards of the hospital has gone down over the years. I had to stay in a few years ago and the bell in the bathroom was caked in faceas, yeah great, that I didn't have to ring it!
ewww.
The hospitals are under funded unlike our banks who have been given billions. I can see the flaw in this can't you?
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.