Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

RSPCA: Jack Russell left with severe skin infection



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 July 2008
Asha Mehta
Timmy, a three-year-old Jack Russell terrier, was removed from his owner in June 2007.
He had lost hair from almost the whole of his body, apart from his neck and hind legs.

He was suffering from a severe untreated skin infection and sarcoptic mange (a skin condition caused by mites) which had caused open sores.
A vet who examined Timmy found that he had suffered for at least two months.

Main article: Shocking rise in animal cruelty cases, 30 July 2008
----------------------------------

Timmy's owner, Wilfred Hopkins (63), was banned from keeping animals for life by Wisbech Magistrates Court in October 2007 after previously pleading guilty to causing unnecessary suffering.

He was also ordered to serve 120 hours of unpaid work and to pay £400 towards costs.

The defendant gave financial reasons as mitigation for leaving Timmy without veterinary treatment.

RSPCA inspector Jon Knight said: "This dog was in a terrible state. His suffering could so easily have been prevented had he just been taken to a vet.

"If pet owners really cannot afford veterinary treatment for their animals, they must seek help from the RSPCA or other charitable organisations. An animal should not be left to suffer for any reason."

External link:
RSPCA Peterborough & District Branch

The full article contains 215 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 July 2008 1:32 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Fenris,

30/07/2008 17:09:29
Where is the benefit to animals if people who are short of money are prosecuted and taken from good homes?

The RSPCA says people should seek help from them if they can't afford vet bills, but the SHG have details of many people who asked the RSPCA for help with vet bills for urgent operations on their animals and were refused.

See http://the-shg.org
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.