Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Turbine tower hits the skyline



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 August 2008
Mark Lewis
9.15am: The Whittlesey skyline has a giant addition after a towering turbine was hoisted into place.
Standing 80m tall at its hub and 125m when one of its three blades is vertical, the huge machine has been built for Cornwall Light & Power.

The complex job of erecting the £2 million turbine saw engineers work through the night at the weekend, using a crane to move the components to another, larger crane, which lifted them into position.

After construction finished at 5.30am on Sunday (August 10), the turbine was left standing proudly on land off Kings Dyke, near Whittlesey (See the location on Google Maps), owned by Abbey Produce, whose Whittlesey warehouse was destroyed by fire in February.

What do you think about more wind turbines on the Fens?
Comment below, email us: news@ peterboroughtoday.co.uk or telephone the newsdesk 01733 588719.
-------------------------------------

Richard Schrader is site manager for contractor R G Carter Civil Engineering, which assembled the turbine and is getting it ready for the switch-on planned at the end of the month.

He said: "It's very satisfying to see it erected after you've been working on and planning the project for months.

"To see that end product is your reward.

"I think a gaggle of turbines looks better than a line of pylons marching across the countryside."

The new machine stands near the three older turbines at Whittlesey, which were officially switched on in June by energy minister Malcolm Wicks, and are thought to be among the largest in the country.

While they produce electricity to cut the bills at the McCain Foods factory, the new windmill – which is the same size – will generate power for the local distribution network.

The turbine is anchored by 4m- deep foundations, containing 250 cu m of concrete, and was assembled on site after arriving in sections by road.

But first, the larger of the two cranes had to be put together with the help of its smaller counterpart, after it arrived from Ireland, broken up into sections, which filled 14 trucks.

The 1,000-tonne capacity leviathan lifted the three sections of the mast into place, followed by the hub and then the three blades which slot into it.

Work is now carrying on to prepare the turbine to start making electricity by August 28.

Meanwhile, efforts to build another turbine for Cornwall Light & Power on Abbey Produce land, off St Mary's Road, at Ramsey, have been hampered by the poor weather this week.

Mr Schrader said: "It takes approximately two days if there's no wind, but if there's a slight wind, a part of the job that would take one hour takes three or four instead."

Head of construction management for Cornwall Light & Power John Mills said people seemed to have become used to turbines.

He said: "I think they are accepted. I have been working in your area for the last few months and I haven't found anyone that found them offensive."

The full article contains 500 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 August 2008 9:10 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

Stuart B,

Whittleborough 14/08/2008 09:34:07
Wind turbines look a damn site better than a nuclear power station - or indeed the gas fired one at fengate. Take yourself back 150 years and the fens would have been littered with windmills, I never understand the objections?
2

DonB,

Peterborough 14/08/2008 09:35:30
Exactly what use would it be, to express the opinion that wind turbines are ghastly?
As for "becoming used to wind turbines", we have no choice, do we!
3

A Seymour,

14/08/2008 09:56:01
The efficiency of wind turbines is generally very poor nuclear power is very efficent, you also have to remember there is a big government hand out for installation of wind turbines without this there would not be any as they do not make commercial sense for bulk power generation. I agree with DonB they are a ghastly blot on the landscape but of course most people have been brainwashed by the Green's so dare not speak the truth.
4

LJ.,

14/08/2008 10:09:13
True, Wind turbines look better than Nuclear Power stations... But there are not hundreds of power stations scattered all over the country. Sadly the wind turbines are becomming... 'everywhere you look' why can't they all be huddled together in very low populated areas where fewer people see them?
5

Scamp,

Huntingdon 14/08/2008 11:20:38
People need to get over their 1960's fear of nuclear power stations - technology has moved on a fair bit! NP is the cheapest and safest way to produce the energy the world needs right now. Natural energy may be all very well for the green brigade, but it's not energy efficient when you balance costs against production. Turbines are expensive to produce and run and have a limited lifespan. And how does a forest of huge noisy white sticks look better than one discreet building? Turbines ruin the look of the landscape and are very dangerous to anyone using the airspace around them. Fishermen in Norfolk are losing their livelihood cos they can't fish anywhere near the ones off Hunstanton. Tell me again how the turbines are boosting the local economy cos I didn't get that memo!
6

KiwiinPboro,

14/08/2008 11:25:18
I'm all for Nuclear Power and the amount of electricity from wind turbines is shocking. If Britain is to become less reliant on other places in the future more nuclear power is the only way.
7

Claire R,

Peterborough 14/08/2008 12:11:01
Am I the only person who thinks they look attractive?? A blot on the countryside my a**e! It's not as though they are obstructing the view. There is nothing to see, does that mean people complain about electricity pylons and suchlike too??
8

Joff,

Peterborough 14/08/2008 12:30:38
We watched the turbine being put together from the Green Wheel cycle route which overlooks the quarry and turbine site.

It would be nice for developers to include some kind of viewing station for local schools to run educational trips to, I for one would love to get a view of the City from up there!
9

INTP,

14/08/2008 12:37:57
Aesthetically speaking, i can't see how anything can make the fenland panorama any less attractive. At least the windmills give it a bit more character.
As for more Nuclear, i'm all for it once they figure out where they are gonna dump all the extra waste.
10

Metalbasher,

14/08/2008 16:16:49

After 30 years when a wind turbine is decommissioned most of the material can be recycled and at worse you are left with a large block of inert concrete in the ground. After a slightly longer period when you come to decommission a nuclear power station a significant amount of material has to be decontaminated before it can be recycled and then you are left with the irradiated material from the reactor which has to be stored "safely" for hundreds of years.

Nuclear Power Stations have to be large to work efficiently. This means they produce very large amounts energy that has to be distributed via the National Grid. However the grid is extremely inefficient losing up to 50% of the energy through transmission losses. Most wind turbines whilst probably not as efficient as Nuclear feed into the local network with far lower transmission loss. In that way making them comparable to nuclear.

Finally can I dispel a couple of urban myths. Out on the Fens as I drive home from work I can count at least 43 wind turbines. Some are very close to where I live. I have yet to hear the mysterious noises they are supposed to make and their effect on house prices is a nice round zero.

They are elegant simple pieces of engineering. Some of the early R&D was done in Peterborough at Brotherhoods in Werrington. It is a shame that all the nimbys and other misseryguts that read the Daily Mail did not support British Innovation and now we are buying back our own technology from the Danes and the Germans.

Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.