Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Quarry expansion plans made public



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
14 August 2008
MILLIONS of tonnes of building materials are to be dug from vast swathes of land on the outskirts of Peterborough to provide homes for Peterborough's expanding population.
Peterborough City Council has been handed tough building targets to meet the needs of a city which is expected to swell by 40,000 people by 2021, and must extract three million tonnes of sand, gravel and clay from the ground each year for the next two decades.

To meet the challenge, the authority is planning to extend existing quarries in Maxey, Thorney and Whittlesey by a total of 550 hectares, or 5.5 million square metres.

Details of the proposals are being unveiled along with plans for a number of recycling and waste disposal sites across the Peterborough in public consultations beginning in September.

What do you think about the plans?
Comment below, email us: news@ peterboroughtoday.co.uk or telephone the newsdesk 01733 588719.
-------------------------------------

The council is also leafleting every home in the city about its planned £38 million household rubbish incinerator in Fengate, Peterborough.

Senior minerals and waste planning officer Sue Marsh said the extra quarrying was one of a number of measures needed to accommodate the city's expansion.

She said: "Peterborough is within a growth area and there is a considerable amount of extra housing projected between now and 2026.

"We have to make sure enough construction materials can be excavated to enable that development to take place, and to do that we have to identify locations where this excavation can happen."

The proposals, part of the council's minerals and waste plan, are to extend quarries in Maxey, near Market Deeping, Pode Hole, near Thorney, and Kings Delph in Whittlesey for building materials.

They also include the extension of Middle West Farm quarry in Thorney to provide material for the A1073 bypass, currently being built between Eye and Spalding.

Information roadshows
Incinerator plans

  • Saturday, September 6 – Queensgate.

  • Wednesday, September 10 – Dogsthorpe Community Centre

  • Thursday, September 11 – Cathedral Square.

  • Saturday, September 13 – Serpentine Green shopping centre, Hampton

  • Quarry and waste disposal plans

  • Tuesday, September 9 – Eye

  • Wednesday, September 10 – Dogsthorpe Community Centre

  • Thursday, September 11 – Wansford Community Hall

  • Monday, September 15 – New Link, Lincoln Road

  • Tuesday, September 16 – Manor Leisure Centre, Whittlesey

  • Thursday, September 18 – Queensgate shopping centre.

  • Monday, September 22 – Maxey Community Centre

  • Tuesday, September 23 – Serpentine Green shopping centre

  • Thursday, September 25 – Peterborough Regional College


---------------------------------------


Other plans for the expansion of rubbish disposal facilities have been drawn up, not just for dealing with Peterborough's waste – five per cent of the waste to be managed in the area between now and 2026 is expected to come from London.

The plans include extending the existing recycling centre in Dogsthorpe, and building new recycling facilities in Storey's Bar Road, in Fengate, Saxon Pit and Kings Dyke in Whittlesey and the Hamptons or the Ortons areas of the city.

Existing quarries in Thornhaugh, near Stamford, and Star Pit, in Whittlesey, are also being earmarked to take commercial and household landfill waste.

The planned city incinerator in Fourth Drove, Fengate, referred to by the council as an "energy-from-waste plant", would generate power from non-recyclable waste. It would also be used as an alternative to the Dogsthorpe waste centre when it is filled and closed in 2013.

Both public consultations will include a number of roadshows.

The full article contains 560 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 August 2008 11:45 AM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Michael Ryan,

Shrewsbury 15/08/2008 11:18:29
The City of Ottawa has recently awarded a contract for a plasma gasification plant to Plasco for disposal of municipal waste.

The City of Peterborough would be wise to do the same as it's the safest and cheapest method of waste disposal and produces no toxic ash, which incineration leaves behind.

The "gate fees" for the above Plasco plant are approximately thirty pounds per tonne, whereas gate fees for incineration are over sixty pounds per tonne in the UK.

When the health-damage costs of incineration are included, the total cost is about 130 pounds per tonne of waste burnt, so you can see that plasma gasification costs about one hundred pounds per tonne more than incineration.

If you believe the government and Defra spin that incineration does not harm health, ypu might ask why the Health Protection Agency have not bothered to check the rates of illness or premature deaths at electoral ward level around any incinerator, despite their promise to check health effects of incinerators and landfill sites in the Western Daily Press article of 6 August 2003.

The Dorking Advertiser and Surrey Mirror both reported the HPA's failure to examine healh effects of incineration and you can read their articles of 22 May 2008 via links at the left hand side of the home page at www.ukhr.org

Kind regards

Michael Ryan,
Shrewsbury
2

Michael Ryan,

Shrewsbury 15/08/2008 11:21:45
I apologise for my error in the above blog. Plasma gasification is about one hundred pounds per tonne cheaper than incineration when health damage costs are included.

Kind regards,

Michael Ryan,
Shrewsbury
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.