Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

New energy park plans for centre of excellence



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 September 2008
Stephen Briggs
THE new £250 million energy park to be built in the city will include a centre of excellence for scientists researching waste management, the company behind the plans has revealed.
Alongside cutting-edge technology which will turn rubbish into enough energy to power 60,000 homes a year, Peterborough Renewable Energy Limited (PREL) says national experts on the process will be employed at the research and development centre on the site, bringing highly skilled jobs to the city.

Plans for PREL's energy centre, which would be located in the Fengate industrial area of the city, will be submitted to the Government today, and include plasma technology never before used in Britain.

The 34-acre site would be able to deal with 650,000 tonnes of rubbish every year, converting it into heat, energy or materials that can be used in industry with, the organisation has stressed, limited effect on the environment.

Managing director Chris Williams said: "There will be 109 employees at the plant, and at least 60 per cent will be graduates, many of who will be working in the research and development centre, trying to improve the process and technology as much as possible.

"We want to attract young, enthusiastic people to the facility, which will also be good news for Peterborough."

Alongside the research and development centre, there will also be lecture halls and a visitor centre, to allow people to see how the facility works.

Mr Williams said the energy park's new plans also enhance the city's green credentials, as not only will the emissions from the plant be environmentally friendly, saving 12 million tonnes of carbon dioxide in 20 years, but it is also hoped that the buildings themselves could become a haven for wildlife.

The structures will have "green roofs" with grass and other plants growing on them – one of the roofs is intended to be just the right habitat for the black redstart, one of the rarest birds in Britain.

The green spaces will also provide employees with somewhere to relax during the summer months.

Plans include grassland and ponds throughout the site, to encourage other wildlife to the area.

And the company claims that because the only materials that will be incinerated at the site will be biomass – wood, plants and straw, for example – the carbon dioxide produced by burning the matter will be neutralised by the amount of carbon dioxide the plants had absorbed when they were alive.

Mr Williams said: "It is important that the centre has green credentials, and we have been very careful to put this in our plans.

"Only 32 per cent of the land will be taken up with the actual buildings, with a lot of land being green spaces, which we hope will be the perfect habitat for wildlife. This is in contrast to other developments in the area, where there is a lot of concrete.

"The emissions produced at the site will also be very green. In fact, the cleaning process is so efficient that the air coming out of the plant is actually cleaner than the air that goes in."

The full article contains 525 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 03 September 2008 4:57 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

lightbulbbritches,

sat down at home 03/09/2008 12:25:04
I thought because it burnt waste it was an incinerator. Now I find out it's an 'energy park'. Well I for one want to see more parks - but not for energy. I'm outraged that watts, volts and other electrical measurements will have their own swings, slides and even climbing frames, when our children have to play with pieces of broken glass and roadkill on Bourges Boulevard.
2

lightbulbbritches,

03/09/2008 12:28:53
"The green spaces will also provide employees with somewhere to relax during the summer months."

Crikey. All those 60 plus graduates, definitely not three fellas, one of whom is leant on a broom looking into a hole, will be able to sunbathe in New Shangri-la (formerly known as Fengate).



3

lonelygoatherd,

03/09/2008 12:53:22
This is the way business should be run, with time for the employees to stop and think rather than being pressurised to produce every last penny of profit. Everyone benefits in the long run, employees and employers. "lightbulbbritches" should put pressure on the local authority or landowners to clean up rather than sour-graping about PREL. By the way, I don't have any connection with PREL.
4

lightbulbbritches,

03/09/2008 13:03:40
How do you know they are going to have time to "stop and think" - just because you put some turf down doesn't mean teacher is going to let class take their computers outside.
There's yards of grass at London Road but Darren Ferguson makes them poor boys run round it. And on a Saturday as well - they should have the day off, poor loves.
5

James_Werrington,

Peterborough 03/09/2008 13:20:47
I personally feel uneasy about waste management research being carried out so close to the city.

I’d question whether “wood, plants and straw” are rubbish at all. Surely they should be going into compost?
If that’s all that’s being incinerated then it’s totally pointless.
This stuff should be composted by people at home, the council is just too weak to do this.

This “energypark” is going to have zero effect on our waste problem.
6

Chris@prel,

Work 04/09/2008 15:14:33
James_Werrington, the research at the park on waste will be to improve the products that can be made by recycling and re-manufacturing waste. The aim of the research is to remove the notion of waste - we the public may create "rubbish" i.e. something we give no value to, but that does not mean it is waste. e wood plant and straws - not everything can be composted - much of the materials we are being offered is tailings from compost plants in addition there is all the demolition wood waste that includes nails, paint and other materials that make them unsuitable for recycling in the traditional way.
Regarding the waste problem - which is significant and is not just the stuff in your wheelie bin, the plant will make a local impact reducing the amount going to landfill. The waste and materials we will take in the main are those that are destined for landfill. the exception is grey straw - which will be a paid for crop to demonstrate that food and fuel crops do not need to compete.

to lightbulbbritches, not all things that burn are incinerators, and the space around the R&D centre will be open to the public so you too can sit on the green roof and enjoy the break. To find out more request a summary of the application free.
7

lightbulbbritches,

05/09/2008 13:57:47
Thanks Chris,
just one question, in the story it says: "Mr Williams said the energy park's new plans also enhance the city's green credentials, as not only will the emissions from the plant be environmentally friendly, saving 12 million tonnes of carbon dioxide in 20 years, but it is also hoped that the buildings themselves could become a haven for wildlife."

How will the plant save 12m tonnes of carbon dioxide? What is that compared to?
8

Chris@prel,

still at work 09/10/2008 17:18:04
Lightbritches - thanks for the good question - i have tried topost a response 3 times now but it doesn't want to go! - The answer you want is on page 57 of the ES which can be found on the website at http://www.prel-online.co.uk/downloads.html under environmental statment. or if you send me an email I will send directly - (info@prel-online.co.uk)
Basically the benefit is over 20 years representing a 600K saving per year of carbon dixoide equivalent emissions. these are based on subtracting the amount of CO2 we produce from the biomass compared to the amount of CO2 that biomass would produce in a landfill that had 24% methane recovery. Then we add to the savings the amount of CO2 we have displaced were the amount of energy the energypark produces were made from the standard UK energy mix. We then add the benefit of recovering for direct use the metals from the plasma plant. All in all we get an average 594,000 tonnes per annum without any CO2 from glass benefit. This has been rounded up to get the 600K per year. As I say more detail on the web or via email any time.

Thanks for a good question
Chris
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.