Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Energy-from-waste plant: Power for 60,000 homes



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Jonny Muir
The new Peterborough Renewable Energy Limited (PREL) facility is set to be 10 times larger than the council's proposed energy park.
And rather than burning household waste, PREL's building will deal with industrial, and even hazardous, waste, from a much larger catchment area than the city council's project.

It would be able to deal with more than 650,000 tonnes of waste every
year, most of which will come from within 20 miles of the Fengate location.

It is hoped the facility will improve the city's green credentials, creating enough power to light up 60,000 homes.

Last year Chris Williams, managing director of PREL said there was no risk of harmful chemicals being emitted into the atmosphere. He said: "The cleaning is so efficient that the air coming out is actually cleaner than the air that comes in from the outside.

Proximity is not an issue

THE city council energy-from-waste plant will be of a size suitable for the disposal of the household waste from Peterborough that cannot be recycled.

The council says the technology has been tried and tested and is reliable and safe.

It is already being used in many of Europe's most environmentally conscious countries – such as Sweden, Denmark, Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

The technology used and the operation of the energy-from-waste plant will conform to an Environmental Permit issued by the Environment Agency, under the most stringent safety guidelines.

So the proximity of the city council energy-from-waste plant and PREL's proposed site has no relevance.

Related: Site of proposed new energy plant revealed
Two incinerator sites could be neighbours. 06/06/08



The full article contains 282 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 June 2008 12:00 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

lonelygoatherd,

Peterborough 06/06/2008 12:57:42
Both these facilities are supposed to emit minimal emissions - less in a year than Ferry Meadows fireworks display in one night. BUT . . . no mechanical system works perfectly, tyres burst, tower cranes fall over, drivers fall asleep at the wheel. Can Chris Williams tell us what happens when his operator falls asleep, leaves the furnace door open or even when the furnace is warming up or cooling down? In other words, what are the consequences of a system failure.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.