Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Stewart Jackson MP: reactions to change


Westminster Life - 21/11/08

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 November 2008
Why is it that proposals for change in Peterborough quite often generate more heat than light, and there are always folk around to say "It's impossible!" or "It's been tried before" or, more usually "It's a conspiracy"?
We've seen it over the fountains in Cathedral Square and the – in my humble opinion – welcome plans to demolish the Corn Exchange and replace it with something a lot easier on the eye and befitting of a city with a decent dose of civic pride.

Such is the fuss about the proposals to develop the former Bretton Woods secondary school site in Bretton, featured in The Evening Telegraph this week.

Am I missing something? Why the plaintive cries of cover up?

The way some people are talking, you would think Bretton 2010 are some kind of Stasi.

And before people moan about the parish council, at least they have got off their backsides and stood for election instead of carping from the sidelines.

Let's remember: These are proposals – for consultation – so that everybody can have their say – local residents, businesses and visitors, as well as the great and the good.

Nothing is decided, as far as I know. No one is riding roughshod over anyone else.

Of course Peterborough City Council and Bretton 2010 need to look to the future, knowing that they will not please everyone.

The school is gone, leaving only nostalgic memories. We can't afford the luxury of leaving the area stuck in a '70s timewarp.

Surely the onus must be on those complaining to answer some straight questions.

Do they believe there should be no homes built for local people in the area when we have 9,000 people on the city's housing waiting list?

Is the Pyramid Centre so perfect that it can't be improved? Is the bus service in the area as good as it could be?

Can Bretton Park be as beautiful as Central Park and Itter Park?

I'm all for a lively debate – but let's not shoot the messenger or let those who shout loudest drown out more timorous voices.

Everyone should be allowed to contribute their ideas for Bretton's future.

The full article contains 362 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 November 2008 1:11 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Concerned Resident of North Bretton,

Watergall 25/11/2008 11:27:42
Yes Mr Jackson, Bretton Park is as beautiful AND important as Central and Itter Parks. I have live in North Bretton for 17 years and walked my three children to Eyrescroft Primary School through this lovely traffic free environment for 12 years plus, and a wonderful space it most definitely is.

At a time when western Governments bang on about "environmental issues" such as the importance of saving rain forests, protecting wildlife and global warming (the list is endless), I find it amazing that Bretton Park has been proposed for housing. Do you live in North Bretton Mr Jackson? I'm sure that if you did, you would know that we have enough houses, traffic and social issues as it is. Also, what are our children meant to do once the basket ball court, BMX Track, Crofts Corner Play Centre as well as Watergall Primary and Eyrescroft Primary school fields are lost to these "proposed" houses? Do you even care or is it just a case of meeting the latest Government guidelines at any cost?

Feel free to build on brown site land such as the industrial site at Marholm Road and on the old site of Bretton Woods School, but leave our green urban spaces alone, Bretton Park is an important space for ALL residents and I can't imagine anyone living in North Bretton would agree or welcome these proposals.
2

dave - welland,

Peterborough 25/11/2008 14:49:52
It is well known that most property developers are among the most corrupt people in the world and will stop at nothing to to make a quick buck, not caring who they trample in the process. But in order to have their way in making their millions, they HAVE to get the local politicians and councillors on their side. So, like I asked that Fitzgerald chappie in a comment recently: Whats in it for you, Mr.Jackson?
Instead of allowing the building of more matchbox houses, why doesn't Mr. Jackson work to improve the infrastructure of what is already there and ensure the people already living in the area are as comfortable as he himself is. Of course he will not, because there's nothing to gain, is there?
Its time Mr. Jackson, and the arrogant lot of Tory councillors realised they are beholden to us for their very existence.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.