Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Peterborough ET site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

National on the Nene a complete disaster



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 October 2008
IT has always been the case that the River Nene can be a fickle and at times difficult water, yet even through some poor times I have been the first to defend it against criticism.
Natural fisheries are never going to compete with commercial waters as far as weights are concerned but they do have a good following from anglers that enjoy big matches, the countryside, running water fishing and the knowledge that every day can produce something a little different.

However, a patchy season so far on our local river in the lower section culminated on Saturday with a disaster beyond anyone's comprehension.

In the NFA Individual National fished on Middleholme and North Bank the fishing was abysmal with 53 dry nets and the majority of the field failing to break a pound.

That is totally unacceptable. Those fishing were the cream of England's anglers yet they struggled to catch a single fish on a venue that was once recognised as one of the best in the country. So what's gone so badly wrong?

It is hard to say it's one particular problem, but I can put my own theories forward. The weed growth over the past few years has got so bad that several sections of the lower end of the River Nene are unfishable.

We get very little if any flow on the river through the summer months. The river stays clear, in fact so clear you can see the bottom right across it in many sections. When it does colour up it only lasts for a day or so as the water is pushed through and out to sea before you can blink an eye.

Finally, and not for the first time, we have once again got seals in the area. I am convinced there are two, possibly even three, devouring stock fish at will. Anglers can do nothing about it but watch in horror as the sea creatures ruin the fishery from the Dog and Doublet up to Orton Locks.

Will the Environment Agency address the rivers problems? No, I think not. Will they keep taking anglers money in rod licence fees and rents? Yes they will.

A few years ago I went to a private meeting and was asked by some fairly high ranking EA personnel what anglers would like more than anything else apart from lots more fish and I replied "colour and flow" to our rivers once again.

I never did get an answer, so do not hold your breath waiting for anything to change soon.

I can see the river getting choked with weed, silted up in many areas and gin clear for some time to come. There seems to be no river management any more.

I fear it will go the same way as the River Welland. It will possibly become a playground or breeding area for lost seals – it certainly will not be much use to anglers for much longer.

Peterborough DAA have worked long and hard to bring big events to the area which in turn provides revenue for the city's hotels and retail outlets.

Just a few short years ago there was even talk of a European or even a world championship of some sort being hosted on our river.

Only last week I was in discussions with a senior NFA man with regard to a big international match being hosted by PDAA. Unless we see a rapid improvement I fear for the local club and indeed anyone that used to enjoy fishing the lower sections of our river.

For the record there can rarely, if ever, have been a worse result than this one on the River Nene. A flat calm river, no flow, gin clear and very weedy in some areas saw anglers blanking all too often right along the match length. Even the usually productive Middleholme section failed miserably.

As in every match though there has to be a winner and in this year's event the title went to Nigel Goddard with a modest 2.69kg. The odd better fish together with plenty of smaller fish saw Goddard the only angler to break a kilogram.

Result: 1 N. Goddard, 2.69kg; 2 G. Mumby, 930gm; 3 S. Fry, 580gm; jt 4 S. Rowe and B. Lucas, both 550gm; 6 I. Sharratt, 490gm.

The full article contains 725 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 01 October 2008 12:04 PM
  • Source: Peterborough ET
  • Location: Peterborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

mrbrown,

01/10/2008 13:29:44
Seals will devour fish stock at will, because that's what they do. What a shame. I suppose anglers would like to see them all killed, along with cormorants, to stop them spoiling their sport.
Anglers need to realise that rivers are wild places, with wildlife that eat fish to survive. They are not doing it to spite anglers and ruin their fishery. And let's face it, they have been around much longer than men who chose to spend a day sitting on a riverbank for fun.
Rivers are not purely leisure facilities for anglers, boat users and so on.
Most of us non-anglers would probably celebrate the fact that seals are coming this far up the river, for whatever reason. Let's hope, for the anglers' sake, that otters don't start making a serious comeback. They'll be calling to bring back otter hunting.
2

A higher presence,

01/10/2008 13:30:56
Seals have more right to be in the Nene than fishermen do. Who cares if they can't catch anything? Why don't they find a more exciting hobby? There's nothing more pathetic than a load of fat, middle-aged men sitting on plastic boxes, sucking on maggots in the rain and waiting for a nibble on their lines. How very boring.
3

sonnyjim,

01/10/2008 14:37:29
Can't help but mirror the comments of the previous two submissions. Rivers are for everybody not just anglers. Anglers are a pain anyway, they monopolise the river banks including the paved areas along from the Town Bridge, making it impossible to walk along the bank or even anywhere near it because of the Roach poles extending back 20 foot or so and on several foot high supports.

What's the point anyway they only throw them back again
4

mrbrown,

01/10/2008 14:47:43
And surely if there are more natural predators around, it makes catching a fish more of a challenge, and more of a sport. Most anglers I'm sure would love the rivers to be filled brim full with artificial stocks of fish, so they can sit there getting bites all the time and fill their keep nets every time. Surely the measure of a good angler is one who can catch more than everyone else, using skill and experience rather than just luck.
Even so, I don't think three seals will empty the Nene of fish.
5

Paul33,

01/10/2008 16:15:14
I'm a keen fisherman but I can't abide these hard-nosed match fishermen like Ken Wade who see fishing as nothing more than a sterile ego-boosting, money making contest.

His weekly column in the ET is totally taken up by details of one match or another as if that is representative of the sport of fishing - it isn't.

If the seals drive the matchmen away from the Nene them I'm voting Sammy seal at the next election. Go line-up your matchmen round some artificial pond stocked artificially with thousands of fish and get on with it - leave the lakes and rivers to those who want to enjoy fishing as it has always intended to be.
6

paul 63,

01/10/2008 18:54:34
is that the same hard-nosed matchman[ken wade],who recently pulled a little girl from the river,therefore saving her life.i wonder if any of the ignorant people above have done anything
as heroic?or are they too busy sitting in judgement of everybody else.
7

Paul33,

01/10/2008 19:56:50
What the fudge has that got to do with fishing ? Are you saying you wouldn't have pulled a drowning girl from a river or that any of us wouldn't have ?

He is a hard nosed matchman and that is all he ever talks about. He misrepresents a great sport as being nothing more than match fishing.
8

barbusbruce !!,

york 02/10/2008 20:15:45
A higher presence,01/10/2008 13:30:56
Seals have more right to be in the Nene than fishermen do. Who cares if they can't catch anything? Why don't they find a more exciting hobby? There's nothing more pathetic than a load of fat, middle-aged men sitting on plastic boxes, sucking on maggots in the rain and waiting for a nibble on their lines. How very boring.

............................................
sonnyjim,01/10/2008 14:37:29
Can't help but mirror the comments of the previous two submissions. Rivers are for everybody not just anglers. Anglers are a pain anyway, they monopolise the river banks including the paved areas along from the Town Bridge, making it impossible to walk along the bank or even anywhere near it because of the Roach poles extending back 20 foot or so and on several foot high supports.

What's the point anyway they only throw them back again
........................................
mrbrown,01/10/2008 13:29:44
Seals will devour fish stock at will, because that's what they do. What a shame. I suppose anglers would like to see them all killed, along with cormorants, to stop them spoiling their sport.
Anglers need to realise that rivers are wild places, with wildlife that eat fish to survive. They are not doing it to spite anglers and ruin their fishery. And let's face it, they have been around much longer than men who chose to spend a day sitting on a riverbank for fun.
Rivers are not purely leisure facilities for anglers, boat users and so on.
Most of us non-anglers would probably celebrate the fact that seals are coming this far up the river, for whatever reason. Let's hope, for the anglers' sake, that otters don't start making a serious comeback. They'll be calling to bring back otter hunting.

.......................................................

its a shame you lot have such a sad outlook on life and i feel sorry for you angling is not just for "fat middle aged men" it is by far the biggest participant sport in the
9

barbusbruce !!,

york 02/10/2008 20:17:25
TRY AGAIN !!

Its a shame you lot have such a sad outlook on life and i feel sorry for you angling is not just for "fat middle aged men" it is by far the biggest participant sport in the UK ,enjoyed by men,women and children,and recently claimed gold in the world championships again , paying millions into the enviroment agency who look after our rivers and they have now got them or most of them out of the polluted waterways they once were,just tell me the last time you contibuted to the upkeep of the waterways that you can take a nice walk down without seeing slicks of oil etc etc,you along with the rest of your liberal minded lefties need to get off your asses and help preserve our waterways like we do ,we as anglers are usually the first to report pollution incidents safegaurding not just fish stocks but all manner of wildlife from tiny invertabrates to even the seals , so please tell me when you last contributed to the upkeep of our rivers ,you lot make me sick, you want it all but dont want to give anything in return.
we as anglers pay to fish our rivers etc so how about the enviroment agency charging for walking the banks etc etc after all we pay for the privelige to use the rivers/banks etc why shouldnt you ,get of your ass and do something instead of complaining !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

as for bringing back otter hunting in some parts of the country it would be a good idea as to the damage they are causing along with mink etc etc that people like your selves would no doubt support sabbotuers that release the mink etc in the first place without one iota of knowledge about the danage that they cause and have caused !!

GET A LIFE AND GET OUT OF MINE !!!!!!!!!!!
10

mrbrown,

03/10/2008 12:01:16
Oh dear, what an angry stream of consciousness.
I thought someone like you would support a cull of a native species struggling to make a comeback, because they interfere with your 'enjoyment'.
As for mink - I agree they should all be removed, as an alien species which causes a disproportionate amount of damage. So no I would not support saboteurs at all.
Good for you for paying something towards the upkeep of the riverbank. Someone has to clear up all your discarded line, weights, old spam tins and all the other stuff you lot leave behind.
My contribution to the upkeep of rivers is, like most of us, as a taxpayer. Rivers are natural things and not, as I said earlier, purely leisure facilities, and I don't think it is necessary to pay to enjoy a walk along them. That would be absurd.
I am pretty far from liberal minded, and I am certainly not a leftie. You assumptions and deductions are, I'm afraid, pretty far from the mark.
So as you pay to fish, you think that gives you some moral superiority to call the shots about river management. Wanting to have seals, otters, cormorants and whatever else stands in your way, killed does not seem like preserving the waterway to me.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.